You cheeky git. How did I know what the judges were scoring FFS? Get a grip, are you just trying to make out you've seen something that the other 95% are too dumb to see?? You really need to check out how judges are supposed to score rounds otherwise you've just going to keep coming up with dumb cards like that because of "ring generalship". Now go to bed before your Dad finds out you've drunk all his cooking sherry.
DOM You obviously can not score a fight drunk. I am obviously more knowledgeable than everyone here, I know about old time fighters, can you tell me about Bert Gilroy or randy Sandy, thought ****ing not. And know because using my knowledge I come to a different conclusion I am ribbed.
Gaz you dont even score fights you just steal a judges card and pass it off as your own. I actually think alot more than 5% had Froch winning.
OK, if you had Kessler winning (which is wrong) explain yourself (or at least try, obviously it is hard to fairly explain when you are biased but oh well)
Methinks that a lot of posters were too cheap to pay for the fight and watched it on a stream. I can see why people seeing this fight on a sloppy stream would mistake ineffective aggression for effective scoring.
you are clearly not smart enough to listen to other people, you are way off, in no was this a robbery. Kessler was controlling the fight and moving Froch backwards for 9 out of 12 rounds and you call it Froch was winning by ring generalship. I saw Froch's knees buckle and I didnt see Kessler hurt in any part of the fight and at the end of the day Kessler landed more punches and put more hurt on, its really not hard to score at all.