Froch should have at least 6 losses on his record

break it down yourself then Freddie Roach?

 

Because Calzaghe's much faster, more skilled and better than Froch, not hard to explain at all.

 

not hard to explain why cowardzaghe ran from his mando with froch too.

froch has much better chin, misses less than joe and has by far way more power and matches joes greatest strength in conditioning, and won major ttiles younger than joe and proved himself capable of making defences of the major titles unlike joey.

 

by running away and the claiming wba wbc unifed titlist froch wasn't worthy a shot at joes wbo title (a logic utterly destroyed by joe offering green, local midlands boxer, single figure resume carl a shot at his wbo title years earlier.)

this is a win according to those on planet calturd.

 

joes easy to hit, carl hits him. joe hits carl and does no damage at all. carl floors him again and again. joe realises he cant ask his usual welsh ref to stop the fight and award him a tko win, so joe stays down.

Or to put it another way,joe runs from his mando with froch.

next question, calturd self destructs once again.

 

LOL you are rebrandishing the point you got schooled on. this is like watching someone self flagellate.

come on, keep up. try again.

 

why, joe could have fought Hopkins straight after easy, there was nothing stopping him from having 3 fights in nearly 3 years.

no- joe actually ran from stiff defences (in particular non-wbo/wassen arranged ones), for the reason he admitted years before, he didn't want no part in tough fights.

 

40something Hopkins was never number 1 at anything on world scene.

joe opted for the ring title hawhaw instead of defending kesslers old unified title.

 

u flopped again mate, you ducked out of answering the OP.

no hard feelings

 

I see what you did there.

Thanks.

Goodbye.

 

In 2008 Froch fought Rybacki and Pascal, Calzaghe beat Hopkins.

The same Hopkins who embarrassed Pascal, one of Froch's best wins years later, who had also just beat Tarver. FLOP mate.

 

No it's called getting back to work and having a life outside of this forum,something a spiteful ***** like yourself should try.

Calzaghe has many ways to beat Froch. Not only is he the better boxer, he is faster and can beat him a range or up close.

Admittedly Froch is best at mid range but Calzaghe would not allow this, his punch variation and speed would have Froch on the back foot throughout the fight due to his porous defence.

If Taylor, Dirrel and Groves can outbox Froch then there is no reason why the greatest 168 fighter of all time cannot.

Froch's greatest win is Kessler.... the same Kessler Joe beat in his prime only didn't need a rematch to do it.

FLOPPED again mate....

 

Rebrandishing? Is that even a real word?

Again Froch was fighting small fry was as known as Junior Witter.

Plus ****** offered the fight to Froch who in turn turned it down, but then again you'd ignore this as it doesn't suit your agenda does it.

 

Froch's power is overrated.

He's a good puncher but as Ward said how many KO'S HAS he had over top level opponents?