Froch: "The Judge That Scored Hopkins Over Calzaghe Was Correct"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Nov 3, 2008.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    You're out on a limb then? Yeah.. Apparently. You are completely full of it, sir. I just had it out with another poster recently over making the statement that I like Calzaghe and consider him to be a "great guy." Would you like me to drag up these posts for you? Here's the reality of the situation - it is you, and other like you that have an agenda. It is you, and others like you that carry a bias. I truly enjoy Joe Calzaghe, pick him to win fights, ect. However, I am a never going to fail to uphold the integrity of truth. Calzaghe DID NOT LAND ENOUGH SCORING PUNCHES TO WIN, GET IT????????????? It's simple. He did not win that fight. Reality. Truth. Ect.
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    WTF is that? Never heard of it.
     
  3. WelshintheUS

    WelshintheUS Active Member Full Member

    650
    0
    Mar 4, 2006

    Am I **** out on a limb.
    As I said..scoring of fights are completely subjective and no amount of sense will make you see that Calzaghe won this fight.

    the FACT is that the judges, the vast majority of pundits and posters on here scored the fight for Calzaghe and you say that it is because they were afraid of going against their initial picks.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Not afraid. We're all very proud to pick outcomes. It's a bias, not a fear.

    "95% of scoring is clean and effective punching" - does that sound subjective to you??
     
  5. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    Hopkins may have won round 1 (it was even barring the KD). Round 2, 3 and 4 even (with an edge to Joe, but ok). Calzaghe clearly winning round 5 to 12.

    Kessler won the first 5 rounds (Calzaghe said so himself). Calzaghe won round 6 to 11 and round 12 even.

    Kessler-Calzaghe was a much closer fight, and Kessler landed far more meaningful punches on Joe than Hopkins did. Bernard was large inactive in that fight.
     
  6. WelshintheUS

    WelshintheUS Active Member Full Member

    650
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    So what the **** did Hopkins do after round 4 to win those rounds for you?

    I am off to watch the interviews on MNF and the remainder of The Skins game now but will happily continue this tomorrow
     
  7. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    clue:

    -He has the vocal modulation of a railway-station announcer, the expressive power of a fence-post and the charisma of a week-old head of lettuce.

    -Hes a Boy Scout with a hormone imbalance.

    -His threads leave the impression of an army of pompous phrases moving over the landscape in search of an idea.

    -he is to objectivity,integrity and maturity what liberace was to pumping iron.

    anyone?
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    He landed clean and effective punches of course. ^ Hopkins clearly won the 10th and 6th on clean, clear as day, scoring shots (no, calzaghe did not land that lead left 45 seconds in to the 6th). You don't get credit for bull rushing your opponent and then throwing flurries that hit their back and shoulders once you're chest to chest. The 11th, 8th, 7th, and 5th were all very close based on Calzaghe's utter inability to land scoring punches, and the small amount of activity by Hopkins.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Stop spamming these threads, shitcrates. This is a boxing forum, child. Get on boxing or **** off.
     
  10. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Do I always have to remind you to CLEAN UP SOME PM SPACE FOR ****S SAKE? :gsg

    Sorry for the interference, Rafa. You two can continue bashing each other.:good
     
  11. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    big talk coming from a guy who hasn't really beaten anyone...:rofl:rofl
     
  12. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
  13. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    Guys just ignore and humour San Rafael's posts, he obviously became a boxing fan when he saw Floyd Mayweather on MTV cribs last year.

    Anyone he disagrees with he just starts swearing at gratuitously, making a complete idiot of himself and his posts.

    I've seen far more intelligent posters on here get absolutely destroyed.
     
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Where's your main account, coward? Was it banned? All I do is swear? Do you see any profanity in my exchange with the Welshman in this thread?? Look, ****face, I NEVER start the insults, EVER. I respond to them in kind. Not ONCE ever have I started with the ****, no need for lying. I've been blindly attacked constantly for my honest and objective view - I'm just strong and can make an impression. I don't need to tell you to remember it, do I? Stay on my nuts though, it makes me feel important. Oh, and keep avoiding the subject of these threads..
     
  15. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    froch is only saying it to get calzaghe's interest and it won't work.

    witter tried that on hatton but at the end of the day guys like froch and witter have to stop ****ing around and make some moves.