Froch: "The Judge That Scored Hopkins Over Calzaghe Was Correct"

There are certain conclusions that can be drawn here, but I would leave this part out of it. ^ What basis do you have to question the legitimacy of his viewpoint? That's just empty speculation isn't it? If he's willing to make a statment like that it it has to be taken at face value. It's not a viewpoint that's going to engender him to fans in the UK, is it now? That would be a pretty stupid agenda on his part..

 

Oh, he's definately playing an angle - that's not to say he doesn't mean what he says, however. That's the point. We can be right about him stirring up trouble, but going that extra length and calling him a liar or deciever is baseless. If he's willing to make a statement like that with the circumstances involved I'd say there is very little chance he doesn't mean it. Obviously.

 

Ok, well now you're getting into how you see Froch and all that.. To me he's only qualified enough to listen to on the subject of the sport itself. When it comes to his contribution to it, I have no interest.

 

First off - every round after the fourth??? LMAO!!! Take the 10th round as one example - you're saying Calzaghe won that round??? SERIOUSLY? Are you biased or some ****?

And yes - there have been claims of bias regarding the American judges. Are you from America?

 

There he is... It's been awhile. :rofl