Froch think the Fury cut was old

KINGWILDER · Feb 7, 2024

shadow111 said: ↑

Oh cool. This should be fun. What holds the waters in? Some say Antarctica surrounds us, though I'm not so sure. One thing to consider is that the farther away from the sun (on earth) the colder it would get and eventually the oceans would turn into ice, which would naturally contain the waters. I can understand how you would think it's absurd if you didn't really look into it. Here's one of the more prominent flat earthers explaining the basics :

This content is protected

It's essentially a battle between our observations and experience vs relying on authority telling us what areas outside our grasp are like.
Click to expand...

This post fried more braincells than the entire Fury Wilder trilogy.

lufcrazy · Feb 7, 2024

shadow111 said: ↑

It's based on theories, not proven science. They calculated distances between stars, studied the motion and theorized how it worked based on that. Back then, those who came up with heliocentric theory let alone the globe, had to present their findings and convince others of their conclusions. Some accepted their conclusions, others challenged them. But back then no one could know for sure. Now we have knowledge based on the testimony of those involved with the space program, but there's always gonna be skeptics, given how much revenue is generated by that entity. Anytime you have a revenue generating component, there's every reason for those involved and benefitting from that funding to do anything to keep that money coming in.

I don't have any issue with you believing what they tell us about it, especially with there being a certain amount of pride with NASA being an American institution, but there's always gonna be skeptics when you're dealing with institutions that are out of the public's purview. I'm taking a very neutral stance on this. I'm saying, look, I'm not convinced it's flat, not by a long shot, but I'm also not convinced of the globe either. I see it as a possible deception. The extent of that deception, there's no way to know for sure. I've seen enough problems with each theory to give me pause and to not be comfortable to jumping to either conclusion.

It works both ways. There's a lack of critical thinking involved in solely taking NASA's word for it, believing what they tell us hook line and sinker with no way to verify what they're saying. On the other hand, it's easy to poke holes in the establishment without doing the work yourself. And again, this is why I remain skeptical of the globe while also trying to keep my distance from flat earthers as well.

Well I never felt the need to defend flat earth because that's not what's on trial here. Those who conclude that the earth is flat is because they don't believe that the globe is real. It's either one or the other. If you don't believe in the globe, then it's gotta be flat. The ground beneath our feet is in fact flat. That's our experience. Believing that it starts to curve away from us far off into the distance but being unable to observe or calculate that in any discernible way is the problem with it. Believing in the globe does not require critical thinking but rather involves an appeal to authority (NASA) and just taking all of what they tell us at face value. You can say they did calculations, or they do all this space stuff, but we have no way to know any of that is real. That could just be another deception, like we saw during covid.

But resist the temptation to label me a flat earther, or Froch, or AJ Styles, or anyone who explores this topic, simply for recognizing the predicament, and being open to possible deceptions. It doesn't mean we're sure of anything, it's just being inquisitive about what goes on behind the scenes, in an effort to make sense of the world we live in.
Click to expand...

Ok mate

lufcrazy · Feb 7, 2024

shadow111 said: ↑

Aww that's cute, I sense some hard feelings. It's not flat earth that's on trial though, flat earth doesn't require believing all kinds of crazy stuff like the globe.
Click to expand...

Lmao

The Real Lance · Feb 7, 2024

Jesus f'n christs this is a sh*t show of a thread.... And explains why Shadow can try to say Canelo being in a close fight w/ Floyd was 'possible'!

Pugguy · Feb 7, 2024

Carl Froch’s Mrs is HOT and there’s absolutely nothing flat about her.

Perfect for circumnavigation. Many times over. No falling off.

Off topic?

Hell yeah. When in Rome...

drenlou · Feb 8, 2024

Wizbit1013 said: ↑

Shadow, go back to the flat earth thread for this and stop clogging up boxing topics ffs
Click to expand...

This.

like a boss · Feb 12, 2024

KINGWILDER said: ↑

Can we please post about something else, the Fury thread epidemic is out of control.
Click to expand...

You would be lost for something to do if you didn't talk about Fury all day.

Rumsfeld · Feb 12, 2024

shadow111 said: ↑

Earth is a place that we have access to. Space is a place that we don't have access to. There's a reason why Flat Earth has become so popularized. If you refuse to understand the reasoning and attempt to mock the concept as a whole, without really looking into it or understanding how it makes sense within the framework of our world, then you're not really being honest with yourself about what it actually is. If you took the time to evaluate the concept on its merits you may find that it makes a lot more sense than the globe.
Click to expand...

No. It truly doesn't.

And the easiest way to prove this is by asking a simple question - what is the furtherst city to the east? And to the west?

In a so-called flat earth, there would by necessity be a furthest point in each direction. The inability for a "flat earth advocate" to answer that question destroys the entire "belief system".

like a boss · Feb 12, 2024

Rumsfeld said: ↑

No. It truly doesn't.

And the easiest way to prove this is by asking a simple question - what is the furtherst city to the east? And to the west?

In a so-called flat earth, there would by necessity be a furthest point in each direction. The inability for a "flat earth advocate" to answer that question destroys the entire "belief system".
Click to expand...

Likewise when only the top portion of a ship is visible on the horizon. Where is the bottom of the ship in scenario and where is the ship itself for that matter? Is it hovering in mid air beyond the edge of the earth. Would love to hear Carl Froch explain that one.

KINGWILDER · Feb 12, 2024

like a boss said: ↑

You would be lost for something to do if you didn't talk about Fury all day.
Click to expand...

Ironic.

BCS8 · Feb 12, 2024

shadow111 said: ↑

Flat earth has nothing to do with Aliens if that's the picture you're trying to paint. Aliens are a result of the globe construct. The reason why so many conspiracy theorists belive in Aliens are because they believe in the globe, space, planets. Due to what we're told about how the universe is endless, ever expanding, this leads people to think that other intelligent life must be out there if all of that is true.

It's just ironic that you're using globe-based propaganda to try to tie that to the flat earth. Flat earth is the anti of all of that alien globe force nonsense.
Click to expand...

Well, luckily you're not a Flat Earth apalogist, as you insisted earlier

BCS8 · Feb 12, 2024

like a boss said: ↑

Likewise when only the top portion of a ship is visible on the horizon. Where is the bottom of the ship in scenario and where is the ship itself for that matter? Is it hovering in mid air beyond the edge of the earth. Would love to hear Carl Froch explain that one.
Click to expand...

loool they have their own BS explanation for that too ... with a "super zoom camera" it all comes back into focus

like a boss · Feb 12, 2024

BCS8 said: ↑

loool they have their own BS explanation for that too ... with a "super zoom camera" it all comes back into focus
Click to expand...

The camera would have to be in an elevated position or the bottom of the ship simply isn't there to see. It is obscured by the horizon.

People can't see around corners. It's that simple.

like a boss · Feb 13, 2024

KINGWILDER said: ↑

Ironic.
Click to expand...

But true and here for all to see.

Mark Anthony · Feb 13, 2024

like a boss said: ↑

Likewise when only the top portion of a ship is visible on the horizon. Where is the bottom of the ship in scenario and where is the ship itself for that matter? Is it hovering in mid air beyond the edge of the earth. Would love to hear Carl Froch explain that one.
Click to expand...

Do you really believe in a flat earth?!

Log in or Sign up

Froch think the Fury cut was old

KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

drenlou VIP Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

BCS8 VIP Member

BCS8 VIP Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Froch think the Fury cut was old

KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

drenlou VIP Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

KINGWILDER Well-Known Member Full Member

BCS8 VIP Member

BCS8 VIP Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member