I had Kesslar 114-113, but there were minimum 4 rounds that could have been scored either way. Not to beat a dead horse but it was a close fight and subjectivity comes into play, period. It's not black and white, it's gray, Froch knew and acknowledged this prior to the fight starting and stated he wanted to stop Kesslar, he couldn't do it, and he lost no more no less.
I scored it 116-112. I've rewatched the fight twice since then and can understand people having scored it 115-113. I can't see why some people have it a draw or had Froch winning though.
don't make us look stupid. froch might of blocked 90% of the punches, but it would of been by his face. the guy has a **** defense.
Showtime might need to grow some balls and ensure that this tourny remains credible in whatever way possible. If that means that nobody knows whos going to judge the fight until the day of, or whatever. there are means in which to ensure professionalism here. location and these things should have been arranged already anyways...
That fight will either be a AA win by devastating KO or wide UD for Froch. Doesn't matter where it is held. Froch might as well get paid
Both yes and no. Still think they shouls all get one fight at home and one away. And then either a neutral place for the last fight 3 different places or on night of boxing-all three fights in a neutral venue.
Sauerland is now suggesting Denmark! Yes go on-go on. http://ekstrabladet.dk/sport/anden_sport/boksning/article1337990.ece Wont make sense to many others than danes reading this one-so feel free to ask. Can´t be bothered runnung it through google translate-that would just produce something equally as non-understandable.
Moneywise Yoy may have a point-but if that results in the fight not being boxed :huh I think it´s fair to say by now it should be in a neutral venue.