Froch to benefit from Khan stupidity

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by carrotcruncher, Apr 12, 2011.


  1. carrotcruncher

    carrotcruncher Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Oct 15, 2008
    The ill advised and seemingly arrogant decision of the Amir Khan team to spit their dummy out and walk away from the country's principle broadcaster of boxing is set to play into the hands of Carl Froch, it would seem. One of the first public statements from Adam Smith after he became the top man in Sky boxing was that he wanted Froch on the network. It was a laudable sentiment, and one that the Sky top brass might now recall as the deal with the Khan fallout.
    Assuming Khan whacks out McCloskey, then Timothy Bradley should follow as a summer opponent. But don't bet a penny on Sky riding back in to sign that. The chances are that it will now bomb in the backwaters of Prime PPV where it will be screened largely for the edification of the sport's anoraks while the crossover audience that might sign up for a SKY ppv after a week of preview programmes will remain untapped. Thus, a talented fighter will be unnecessarily marginalised because team Khan couldn't stand the thought of Barcelona v Real Madrid going on Sky Sports 1 while their product, due to scheduling difficulties, would have gone on Sky Sports 3. Their boneheaded decision, one that seems to assumed fight fans are unable to use a TV hand control to locate a boxing show, beggars belief.
    The word is that Sky have long memories when it comes to such matters, and it would be no surprise if they now consign Khan to the past unless he somehow winds up in the same ring as Pretty Boy or Pac Man.
    All of which plays neatly into the hands of Froch. You cannot but feel sorry for the guy after ITV disgracefully binned the Mick Hennessy promotional deal leaving his fights on the cheapo Prime platform now favoured by Team Khan. But I wonder if Sky are now free to divert Khan cash towards Froch? Lets hope so, because he has been amazing value ever since defeating Jean Pascal in his last live ITV fight. He deserves a big platform for his fights, and maybe he will now get it.
     
  2. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Hopefully Froch takes Khans SKY spot, it's what I've hoped for since this debacle unfolded.
     
  3. Wickio

    Wickio Guest

    Absolutely agree, he deserves it and this is his big chance. I wish him all the best in this situation.
     
  4. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Won't happen. If Froch get's a spot on Sky, it's not because Khan is fighting on a different channel.

    You'll see Bradley/Khan on Sky next, just watch and see.
     
  5. roe

    roe Guest

    The problem's gonna come down to the exact same reasons Khan's team didn't want to be on sky.. money.

    However, at the moment I think Froch is seriously considering taking less UK tv money to get the fight with Johnson on normal sky, in the hope that he can earn more in the future on a pay per view. Hopefully Froch can get some kind of deal with a show over here to double up for Sky Box Office but if that can't happen for whatever reasons, he's going back on Primetime as well.

    One of the main reasons sky dropped Khan/McCloskey from box office was because they already have several future other pay per views already lined up in the next couple of months.

    Sky have a massive reputation to keep and if the continue to increase the amount of boxing on ppv, they'll get a hell of a lot more complaints and threats to leave than they're already getting.
     
  6. Marlow

    Marlow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    1
    May 5, 2010
    hope the greedly little turd is on primetime forever
     
  7. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    I can't see Froch/Johnson being on ppv - its two weeks after the warrens how and perhaps only three weeks before Haye/Klitschko. Sky may be willing to run two ppvs in a month but no way are they doing three in six weeks.
     
  8. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Greedy because he want's to make a turnover so he breaks even?

    I don't see anything wrong with that. This was on Sky PPV the first time, and it broke down because of the card, nothing else.

    If you don't want to pay, then don't, because otherwise, I don't see how it going on Primetime ****ing affects you.
     
  9. 1971791

    1971791 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,742
    0
    Jan 10, 2011
    Also, it's Froch's first major fight there and it'll be at 0400, so sales will be rubbish on PPV. If he wins the Super 6 and comes back to England to fight, then he deserves it.
     
  10. Wickio

    Wickio Guest

    Don't get so defensive, Laz. People are just stating their opinions. I'm sure Amir himself would admit this move has been fuelled by the desire to maximise his financial benefits. Besides, I'm sure he'll be doing much more than breaking even either way.

    But you've got to admit, opting for Primetime over SS3 is a short term decision made to gain as much money for this fight given the circumstances. A very dumb one at that.
     
  11. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    This is an opinion? "hope the greedly little turd is on primetime forever"

    I'm not denying your post. It clearly is, but more so to make something half-decent out of the fight. It is his job after all. In the long-term, it might effect him, but I doubt it.
     
  12. Sogoplayboy

    Sogoplayboy Active Member Full Member

    1,232
    0
    Mar 12, 2010
    Froch Johnson should be on SS1, then he could get the Super Six final on PPV as the selling point would be there for the 'casual' fan. If he were to win the Super Six (something I am more than confident he can do) then he would be able to bargain for Bute/Kessler/Pascal etc to fight UK time on Sky PPV.

    Having said all of this, Khan still has a home on Sky providing he beats McCloskey and fights Bradley next.
     
  13. Wickio

    Wickio Guest

    Well it might not be phrased very eloquently, but it's still an opinion. :lol:

    Personally, I don't think it's a greed, him and his team are trying to make the most of a bad situation with only the short term future being considered. I agree, he is a prize fighter, he fights for money and it only makes sense that he'd try and get as much as possible.

    I'll have to disagree in that it won't have a long-term affect though. Only time will tell!
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I'm not convinced Froch vs Johnson will be on Sky. It's not a fight that people over and above the ''Primetime buyer'' will be all that interested in, especially at 4am.

    In this instance it makes sense to keep that fight on Primetime, with a view to switching to Sky for the final, assuming both he and Ward win.

    Obviously the situations of the two fighters are very different, Froch wants to be on Sky, whereas Khan has basically :finger'd them and made a very rash, and possibly unprofitable move.

    I can kinda understand where he is coming from, he originally expected to make £1m+ and will want to recoup as much of that as he can..... but due to the lack of time involved and Primetime's clear lack of experience in production and also marketing..... it's rash and makes him look bad.
     
  15. roe

    roe Guest

    No way is Froch v Johnson on Sky as a pay per view without help from a good uk card. And as mentioned above it's not gonna happen because it falls between Warren's card and Haye v Klitschko.

    And it won't get on normal sky because they won't cough up anywhere near the money he'd get even for an internet stream (ala Jermain Taylor fight) for a fight that starts at 4am.