Froch v Dirrell Data Boxing Stats

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cobbler, Oct 28, 2009.


  1. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Miles covered: Andre Dirrell - 26.
     
  2. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    thats probably more accurate :lol:
     
  3. redmond22588

    redmond22588 Blood and Guts Full Member

    1,190
    0
    Jun 7, 2008

    hahahahahaha epic
     
  4. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    150 punches landed by froch ? I didn't Know punching air was a scoring shot nowadays ....
     
  5. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    16
    Jun 24, 2007
    It just can't be true
     
  6. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    5,152
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    This is a perfect summary of the fight. :good
     
  7. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    5,152
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    As much of a scoring shot as hitting shoulders
     
  8. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    16
    Jun 24, 2007
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4k-ApwuU6I&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

    stats that I and many others saw in that fight
     
  9. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
  10. dhralf

    dhralf **** the queen! Full Member

    4,950
    0
    Jan 25, 2007
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  11. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Thats easily a bs stats. Frocd landed 153 punches? :lol: And of course ****** people like cobbler believes it.



    I'm curious wheres the stats for rabbit punching by Froch?
     
  12. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    I don't believe any stats for any boxing match. It's not something that lends itself to statistical analysis imo. That's why we have human judges.

    But lots of people, including yourself I believe, were demanding punch stats for this fight, you got your wish.
     
  13. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,193
    24
    Mar 23, 2009
    Froch landing MORE punches then dirrell!??....now thats completly BULL
     
  14. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    0
    Aug 4, 2009
    doesn't supprise me in the slightest.

    Everyone ignored the fact that froch was landing jabs (mostly to the body).

    Also for most of the fight Dirrell was also punching air.

    I was at the fight, and these stats back up what I saw.
     
  15. Mookhound

    Mookhound Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,610
    3
    Oct 11, 2008
    Both lots of stats are jokes.

    While Froch hit air, Dirrell hit a lot of glove.

    I think the important thing is that in the last two rounds Dirrell showed he was the better fighter, but I think Froch scraped enough early rounds when Dirrell showed a bit of inexperience. There were also alot of drawn rounds on my card. This was a very, very close decision either way.

    rematch, though, I would certainly back Dirrell. Perfect style and good enough chin (he did take some shots, whatever people on these forums claim) to beat Froch after this experience. And I've been a Froch fan since the 2001 world ams.