Nobody but surely you moan about padded records, everyone on here does including myself, but your saying that fighters should take fights based on money and should have easier fights to lengthen they're career. And resorting to insults because your becoming to sound more and more foolish..
Yes i have, but only once before though. Froch usually finds a way to win (bar the Ward fight), but this GGG fella is no idiot. Tough call, but Froch would be heavily favored i guess.
My God There is something wrong with you, look through the history of my posts and find the term " padded record " to my knowledge ive never used it Froch vs Golovkin right now doesnt make sense, the kid hasnt fought anyone, Froch on the other hand is on a run of world champions one after the other, and has had some very tough away days If Froch can lengthen his run on 6 figure paydays then THE VERY BEST OF LUCK TO HIM because not many fighters earn that type of money, and if anyone deserves it, its Mr. Carl Froch Does this make sense
So you've never moaned about padded records? Pretty much every poster on this forum has.. Actually a fight against Golovkin would attract a bigger audience and maybe even get shown on HBO, Yusuf Mack is not going to earn Carl big money, which you seem so obsessed with.
in a fight where it is clearly going to be a test of wills, i'll never bet against carl froch this is such a fight.
yeah alright patsch Nah, no obsession, I just think you're a fraud to be honest. Always the first to have a go or call someone a 'mong' yet you never offer any insight of your own and literally just copy other people's points. I don't always agree with thewinfella but I respect his posts a lot more because at least they're his own views. But anyway, I'll quite happily ignore your posts from now on. Not like I'd be missing out on much :hi:
Froch. Bute was a beast before he ran into Froch - It's down to workrate too and Froch will dismantle GG with his jab. I don't ACTUALLY like Froch - I think he's a cocky so-and-so but you can't deny he's top-ten p4p and simply possesses too much heart, class and will-to-win for GG. Would be a cracking fight.
That's cool, I couldn't give a toss if anyone thinks I'm knowledgeable, Your one of them posters that if every single time someone doesn't go into detail on a subject you criticize them. What the **** are you talking about,I copy people? Since when, I always offer my own views but if I see something that I agree with then I'll say it.
who's Golovkin ? in all seriousness he just beat prosky,who is really not that good at all,and people are saying he stands a chance against froch,come on lads ****ing hell:roll: he has knocked out 20 odd journeymen and one prosky(spelling,i know)and some want him to move up and box froch,i hope it happens,froch deserves a easy night :yep
Can't argue with anything in here. Froch is the bigger, more seasoned (as a high level pro) man with GGG having the edge in boxing ability. No need to even talk about this fight yet entertaining for sure but both have a lot of business to sort out in their weight divisions first. Golovkin is hittable and a guy like Froch who won't break under the pressure would have a better chance than a superior boxer with a suspect chin. If he follows the game plan keeps it at range I don't know if he'd have too much trouble.