Froch v Golovkin who wins and how?!

Proska was beaten by Hope LOL!

 

He won comfortably against Hope first time round IMO.

 

No i haven't, like i said to my knowledge i dont think ive ever used the term " padded record ", this is because every fighter in the top echelon of the sport more or less can be accused of this, well nearly every one anyway

Maybe your locked into the days gone by, like poster of the year 2011 Flea Man who i imagine got his ass kicked in Thailand and is taking that out on here, thats if he even went , got to keep the humour up Flea :hey

Ok, Froch vs Golovkin on HBO in the US, for this fight to land on a PPV card it would have to be a co main event, so he'll be on HBO championship boxing, away from home, fighting a prospect who can really bang, for $1M if he's lucky as Golovkin is the HBO fighter ??? u do the math

Plus, what type of gate do you think this fight would attract as a main event ?? it wouldn't, not in America, so where is the revenue coming from ??, its not !!!

Froch vs Golovkin i agree with you would probably do better in the UK than Froch Mack will, but only slightly & Golovkin is a much bigger threat than Mack, and he's hungry and young, he's fresh and he's packing, Froch is inside the last 2-3 fights of his career max, the guys looking at houses in the South of France for him and his Family, he doesnt need Golovkin, he's proven himself against the likes of Golovkin, away from home too :deal, the mans earned the right to pick and choose his big fights, as long as Froch doesnt lose to Mack he's selling out that arena in Nottingham against anyone with a pulse

He will probably fight Kessler and call it a day, who knows if he's headed to 75, if he is, one may think Froch Bellew is being worked on for a swan song (Froch) but again thats pure speculation, then there's massive domestic clashes with Groves and De Gale, clearly Cleverly is out of that picture as it stands but thats a fight thats been mentioned as well, so who knows what he may do, my feeling is he will fight and beat Kessler in a rematch next summer and sail into the sunset with his millions

:good

 

Get your fanny kicked in, in Thailand did you ???

 

I'd have to go for Golovin via late and very painful TKO.

 

this is a fight i would love to see
there is a chance they could ruin each other:hey

 

WTF has that got to do with anything?!?

 

Were you fighting in Thailand?

In organised combat or a saturday night special?

 

Did a wee bit of training, but going to do more this time at Sityodtong.

And yes, unlike Win who actually thinks he's the hardest man ever because he trains I'm well aware of my limtations. Especially against Thai's.

 

Thats cool, id say they dont mess about anyway. Are you training to fight or training for enjoyment?

My tip is the hammer fist to the top of the head. One, because they are all really small and two, because my bro tells me its a serious insult to touch a thai on the top of their head.

:bbb

 

****in hell it looks like they stole ur sense of humour too Son !!!

Relax, it was banter :deal

Edit; and im actually fighting now :smooch

 

Ok so Golovkin and Froch, looking at there boxing fundamentals, taking into account every element of boxing i have Froch the overall better fighter, to me he has more variety, Golovkin can at times look like a pure puncher, even though he's neat and tidy and is not a crude slugger like a Maidana its his unwillingness to use other weapons that makes him look a tad one dimensional, and its the other basic weapons of boxing that i beleive Froch does better that slightly makes him the better fighter, just my opinion.

The modern great - Ricky Hatton , Joe Calzaghe & Carl Froch unfortunately are all bench marks for what can be precieved as the " modern great " i know you like your history but this is what it is today !!, looking over Froch's career he above others pre mentioned he may actually deserve that status a little more

Just to put my own slant on that view, if youve been a multiple weight world champion, or a multi time world champion beating credible guys along the way its difficuilt not to hale them achievements as " great ness " come the end of a career, whet degree or plethora of greatness that is, is debatable

 

Froch is too big, too strong and too determined for Golovkin at the moment. let us not forget, Froch has been in the ring with some monsterous punchers, and some outstanding boxers. Guys like Kessler, Dirrel, Ward, Johnson, Bute, Pascal etc. That list is no joke.

The thing about Froch is that he needs to be in with a real puncher to fight his best. Ward outboxed him, which can be done, and isn't too difficult for a real technician. On the other hand, Bute, Johnson, Abraham, Pascal are all heavy handed guys, and non of the were able to put Carl on the back foot. Pascal landed some huge shots on Froch without so much as a flinch, Bute put a big time left on Carl's in the 2nd round... all that done was fire Carl up, and that sealed Bute's demise.

Carl Froch is so wrong for Golovkin on so many levels.

 

I only think Golovkin has sounder fundamentals than Froch, Win :good

 

Froch, too big and too much of a Hard man for Golovkin.

it'd be a fight and i'd bank on the Cobra