Froch versus Hopkins

BHop is a big name but he's no kind of draw to the fans (as all his fights are desperately dull) so there wouldn't be the big purse Carl's after, plus Froch would be in a no-win sitch; if he wins he beat an old geezer who lost to Calzaghe a few years ago and if he loses (which there'd be a hellishly good chance of) he'd be back to square one. There are a LOT of better fights out there.

 

think this is a bad move fo carl

 

Carl needs to stay wel clear of Hopkins..... it's a no win situation for him... he should get some serious money in his bank before he starts rolling the dice with his belt.... it took him long enough to get up there amongst them it would be foolish to put himself in a no win situation against a fighter that will spoil and try and old man him out of it..... IMO:think:think

 

Hopkins all day.

 

Froch needs to forget this fight, he should go after bute or kessler

 

Hopkins UD

 

As much as I like him, I wouldn't fancy Froch for this. I'd rather see him going for unification bouts, but if it would happen in England it would be great to see B-Hop in the flesh!

 

Froch dosn't have the work rate to beat Hopkins.

 

Froch by KO, easily, go after Hopkins' weakness.

 

This is absolutely the worst fight out there for Froch. He will get little credit for beating such an old man and it adds nothing to his legacy.

There is also the fact that Hopkins style is all wrong for Froch, Hopkins would pick Froch's pockets all night long and win a wide decision. It would be a clinic.

 

Exactly.

Bute or Kessler are better choices

 

I think this would be a great fight actually. Would love to see it happen.

 

It would be interesting to see what happened. Might put more of a spin on the proposed Calzaghe fight of he were to cme trough.

 

hopins rapes him