Froch vs Calzaghe record

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by LondonRingRules, May 26, 2013.


  1. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,519
    1,132
    Nov 5, 2011
    Now that froch has the win over Kessler who do you think has the better record?
     
  2. Obviously Froch, clear as day
     
  3. froch has the better opposition but calzaghe is a much higher ATG P4P figher domestically and world wide

    don't know why people bother with this

    Calzaghe is britans greatest ever SMW and probably the greatest SMW ever , obviously froch has the better record due to opposition
     
  4. DaveyboyEssexUK

    DaveyboyEssexUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,441
    2
    Jan 14, 2011
    :deal
     
  5. BlackBrenny

    BlackBrenny Guest

    well obviously beating a prime undefeated kessler is better than having a win and a loss against a past it kessler
     
  6. Or a lesser experienced greener version to Kessler, and a win vs a more experienced veteran version off Mikkel ;)
     
  7. The_Sugar_Man

    The_Sugar_Man Member Full Member

    340
    0
    Jun 25, 2011
    froch has a far better resume, joe never really fought much opposition when you look through his record.... kessler was probably his best win to date and mikkel was still very green back then.
     
  8. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Losses count and Froch has a few of them.
     
  9. True_Hero

    True_Hero Guest

    Froch has the bigger victory sheet.

    But, I'd say Calzaghe is the better boxer. If prime Calzaghe and Froch had a fight, my money would on Calzaghe on points. It would be close, but Calzaghe would be too good for Froch.
     
  10. Bladecatcher

    Bladecatcher New Member Full Member

    70
    0
    Mar 30, 2013
    A couple of them actually :good
     
  11. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    Froch by a mile.
     
  12. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    Calzaghe would be embarrassed if he had Froch's resume, loses, close wins and all.
     
  13. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    Yeah, because having ancient/shot Boxers on there like RJJ = A great résumé..
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,339
    3,434
    Dec 11, 2009
    This content is protected


    Can someone explain how Pascal, Dirrell, Taylor, Johnson, Mack are good SMW wins? They havent done anything at the weight. Nothing.
    Abraham isnt a top SMW either. I thought he lost the first fight to Steiglitz and then did lose the return and how many posts were on ESB saying Steiglitz was the worst champ etc. Many on here even said Bute was a fighter that never did anything and never stepped up and not a top champ. I actually think Frochs win over Bute was excellent, but just look at how people have changed their posting to suit.
    This content is protected
    Carl Froch............VS.............Joe Calzaghe

    Bute.....................................Kessler --- Both undefeated world champs
    This content is protected
    (Kessler beat Froch)

    Kessler of now........................Eubank
    This content is protected


    Abraham.................................Lacy (Lacy a proven SMW and winner of 5 SMW title fights. Abraham no pedigree at all at SMW was coming off a loss)
    This content is protected


    Dirrell....................................Mitchell (Mitchell a 2 time SMW champ who had never been clearly beaten, only lost by debateable SD in Germany to Ottke, had KOd long time SMW champ Liles, beaten a future SMW champ twice, compared to Dirrell who had done nothing at SMW)
    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    .......................................Veit 2 (Veit an interim SMW world champ) Taylor had not done anything at SMW and was 1-2 coming in, in his last 3 fights
    This content is protected


    Mack........................................Mkertchyan
    Mack had not done anything at SMW whilst Mykertchyan won a European SMW title
    This content is protected


    Johnson...................................Sheika --- Sheika was coming in with a win over prime Johnson, Froch beat faded, boiled down Johnson,
    This content is protected



    Magee......................................Reid --- Calzaghe beat prime Reid (who was a SMW champ), and faded Reid beat prime Magee.
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
    With that above, you can still note Brewer who was a SMW champ, Bika who is still a top 10 SMW, which shows that the era is not as strong as it used to be, Veit 1 who became a SMW champ, Manfredo when a top 10 SMW, Starie who beat undefeated Woods. Then you have the LHW wins over Hopkins and Jones

    A big thing is that many here do not know the division from a few years back before Lacy. People watch the SMW division because of what Calzaghe did and the S6 was to find a champ after he left the division.

    Im a big Froch fan and he is one of my favourite fighters, but I have watched the division from day one and his SMW resume although good isnt up there with Calzaghe, Eubank, Ottke, Kesslers yet
     
  15. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Kessler still beats Froch at 175. Calzaghe was linear champ. Frochs titles are paper..