Froch vs Dawson at 168?? How do you have it.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by rayrobinson, Sep 9, 2012.


Page 1 of 3
  1. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Ward was very good last night , but its clear Dawson isnt a 168 fighter.

    If he wants to stay down there the next name would be Froch, however I think Carl hits way harder, although slower than Ward and is more dangerous to Dawson due ti styles.

    Carl via brutal stoppage in around 6 - 8 rounds.

    Thoughts?
     
    rayrobinson, Sep 9, 2012
    rayrobinson, Sep 9, 2012
    #1
  2. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Dawson UD
     
    Earl-hickey, Sep 9, 2012
    Earl-hickey, Sep 9, 2012
    #2
  3. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Dawson would be confused by Carl's awkwardness.

    We saw how befuddled he was by Pascal's wild, leaping shots....
     
    Beeston Brawler, Sep 9, 2012
    Beeston Brawler, Sep 9, 2012
    #3
  4. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Froch would get to Dawson at some point, Chad is vulnerable.
     
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    #4
  5. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    Froch eventually will exploit Dawson's fragile mentality and stop him.
     
    Bill C84, Sep 9, 2012
    Bill C84, Sep 9, 2012
    #5
  6. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    So is Dirrell and Froch never got to him for 12 rounds.

    Slick guys are Carl's kryptonite, unless Chad Gasses he would be able to win ud by boxing off the back foot(or get robbed in nottingham)

    I'm a huge Froch fan, and think he's a much better fighter than dawson, but he's just not equipped for these kind of guys, he's got no speed. none.
     
    Earl-hickey, Sep 9, 2012
    Earl-hickey, Sep 9, 2012
    #6
  7. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Dawson is slick?
     
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    #7
  8. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    slick enough, baby. Slick enough
     
    Earl-hickey, Sep 9, 2012
    Earl-hickey, Sep 9, 2012
    #8
  9. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    I'll tell you when Dawson fights at 168 again.
     
    ApatheticLeader, Sep 9, 2012
    ApatheticLeader, Sep 9, 2012
    #9
  10. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    :lol: I don't see Chad as a slickster, 'slick' fighters don't get hit often, Chad does. :good
     
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    #10
  11. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    It would be another Bute job
     
    oli, Sep 9, 2012
    oli, Sep 9, 2012
    #11
  12. nick6

    nick6 Active Member Full Member

    873
    1
    Feb 19, 2011
    agreed carl hammers his way to another 5th or 6th round Ko win
     
    nick6, Sep 9, 2012
    nick6, Sep 9, 2012
    #12
  13. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    If Dawson stays at 168, he could end up in hospital or die.

    He's too weight drained at the weight.
     
    Primadonna Kool, Sep 9, 2012
    Primadonna Kool, Sep 9, 2012
    #13
  14. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    :lol:
     
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    BoxingAnalyst, Sep 9, 2012
    #14
  15. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    Dawson will not fight at 168 again.

    It simply is not salient.
     
    Lilo, Sep 9, 2012
    Lilo, Sep 9, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 3