what the **** are you smoking son?you are one of those mcdonald's consummer who thinks us is a continent aren't you?how's ronald mcdonald doing these days?
Dirrell clearly displayed the tools necessary to beat Froch, I'm just not sure he did so consistently enough to win 7 rounds. It was a messy, close fight. Far too close of a fight to be considered a robbery, but a little home cooking probably carried a close round or two to Froch.
A fair and well put assessment.Even as a hardcore Frochy,I have no problem with Jeff's take on the fight.
Wouldnt mind seeing the rematch. Despite what most of you assholes say about Dirrell, he's a talented fighter and gave Froch fits when he let his hands go. Also something else, I find it rather comical that most Bute fans try to down play Dirrell...At least Dirrell wasnt folded up like some cheap lawn chair.
What I dont get is how people give Froch the fight when he barely threw or landed any punches. Its not wrestling, being 'physical' doesnt win you the fight
Direll's advantage just grew bigger and bigger through the fight, despite Froch's constant not-a-****-givin' about the rules, which should cost Froch several points. I thought Froch showed much will to fight in that match, he was awesome. But Direll landed way more punches and he even managed to challenge Froch in straight no-running combat in the last rounds... Froch was definetely the cooler guy in that fight, a true action hero, but Direll did the better boxing and that's a fact for unbiased people who don't deserve a homosexual son.
Direll would beat Lucian Bute :smoke Direll showed me, as a Froch-fan, his talent by fairly beating Froch, despite being exposed to throws and punches in the neck and finally a robbery. I think Froch is way cooler than Direll, but Direll honestly won.