Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

He's practically a novice, fighting in the champions backyard in front of a hostile crowd. He was wary of Froch's power and so chose not to go toe to toe with him for the whole fight. Yet he came off the better in the few exchanges that they did. His team should of had a better gameplan, but as Cobbler pointed out beforehand, they too are inexperienced at this level. If they were to have an immediate rematch in Nottingham, then Dirrell wins easily. I do agree with you in a sense. When Dirrell looks back on his performance last night, he'll cringe with embarrassment at some of it. The WBC belt was his for the taking.

 

ridicolous. froch easily won the fight. don't see how you could argue otherwise.

 

Every american I know said sturm got robbed so what are you bringing that up for. Dirrell got robbed too so admit that too. Froch didn't hit dirrells face more than 20times the whole fight. Those judges should have to sit and explain every round while watching the round. They they could see that froch wasn't landing and was getting his head snapped back all night. Froch was ready to go twice in the fight anyway. Overrated bar fighter with no honor. Can't wait to see him get Knocked out because he sucks as bad as the judges who were influeced by the fans yelling at froch hitting air.

 

easily? :rofl:rofl

change your name to IKnowNothingAboutBoxing

 

Dirrell's last couple of rounds really surprised me last night. He robbed the paying public as well as himself by running and grabbing for so long. If he learns from this he'll be a hell of a fighter. I don't think I've seen many with faster reactions.

 

1. "Dirrell clearly landed many more punches than Froch landed."

2. "Dirrell's punches were, on average, as cleanly landed or landed more cleanly than Froch's were landed"

3. "Direll's best punches moved Froch back as much or more than Froch's best punches moved Dirrell"

 

Dirrell fought like a ****ing ****. He didn't even fight. The little ***** fell down every time he was touched. What the **** was that about? He completely diserved to lose. For the first three rounds he was just ****ing running! Froch was there to do his job and fight, Dirrell was not and should have lost

 

What do you think of Willie Pep's style?

 

He's fast alright. But he was fighting Froch.........

 

What an absolute joke of a post.

I guess everyone should just have a tear up then?

You've been watching too much UFC mate. Froch lost, simple.

I guess you've never boxed and generally dont have much of a clue about boxing.


Plank.



SnR

 

same old slighted americans crying because there supposed slick athletic freak got beat by a defenseless crude european, pathetic! i expected froch to press direll aloft and throw him out of the ring at one point lol now people reckon hes the new jones lol get real, froch won no question.

 

He fought like an frightened women, I'm glad he lost.

 

NO, NO and HEELLLL NO

:yep

 

Im British bollock features.

You're obviously a rowdy, beer swigging, "lets all have a tear up" type of fan.

Clown. He lost.



SnR

 

Exactly. I'm glad someone here hasn't lost all perspective.