Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

If you think that then I can only presume you were watching a completely different fight to me. Maybe you had the rose tinted channel on, eh?

I've tried to stick to the facts and made it clear I don't think either really deserved anything, but if people like you are going to churn complete fantasy facts out like that - then it's time to give the debate up.

 

all i can say is if after reading all this diferent opinions,and we all know there are some people here with better judgment and more knowleadge that most "jurors"...how can you be surprised when the "jury" finds it a split decision??.....you say tomato..i say tOmato

 

According to most of his fans the bolded part is true! Dont believe me just do a search and you'll see.

He does have a very solid, valid point!

 

Who are you? Who the F do you think you are? Huh? Full of mouth you are.

A lot of people thought Froch won?

 

I agree with that.

However, the American's aren't the only ones. They might be more guilty on the basis that they can't keep their mouths shut for 0.5 seconds without feeling the need to declare the next fighter with 2 straight wins as the up and coming Muhammed Ali of their division - but British fans aren't much better.

They just do it with a little more class.

I'll go now.

 

man o man..u really need help..u sure dont know much about boxing but u think u do..i get a kick out of it and ne 1 who says carl won that is talkin stupid ****...u dont know boxing and esb would be much better without posters like u:bbb

 

Comments like this make people think that you've never watched the Steven's fight...This fight is nothing like the Steven's fight...He was actually throwing more in the Froch fight than he was in the Steven's fight...Everybody knows that so I dont really see your point that you're trying to imply.:huh

 

not that many outside the UK..

 

I watched it with a Ukrainian, three Australians and an American.

All but one thought Froch won.

Guess.

 

Froch was hitting Dirrell when the ref said ''stop punching'', ''break'', he slammed him onto the ground, put his gloves in Andre's face, elbowed him, hit him hard deliberately on the back of the head, and held his head while punching.

And than on top of that when you think it can't get worse the ref deducts a point from Andre!!??:shock:atsch OMFG!!!!

It can't get any worse than this people. How blatantly unfair and unjust is this?! Wow. Just incredible.

:barf:barf

 

He was also holding Dirrell's head down with one glove and punching him, he wasn't warned about that also.

 

I said this on the night.. :deal

 

Agreed.

The ref really ws a joke,he was terrible.He was worse than the judges.

 

As a way of protesting Andre could make a good case for boycotting the Super Six from now on.

 

Great point ... he has nothing to worry about because he's never been taken that deep in water and he's consistantly knocking guys out ... who knows ... I know from a skill standpoint, he's not on the level of any other fighter in the tournament (even Taylor) but he's poised, he's calm, he's pretty intellengent and he executes on a consistant basis. Can't really hate on that but at some point in the tournament, he'll be exposed.