Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by darryl1914, Aug 24, 2009.


  1. pwright2k

    pwright2k Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 5, 2009

    Hey brother....not only did Dirrell stand the "heat", but he beat the brakes off of it and made it look like the B-level "flame" that it is.
     
  2. dhralf

    dhralf **** the queen! Full Member

    4,950
    0
    Jan 25, 2007
    :yep
     
  3. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    glad you finally change your avy, the previous one was a disgrace...:good
     
  4. Atritionist

    Atritionist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,473
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    It was a good start, you are bound to run into some fights that just don't match-up for a good fight stylisticly. Hope the worst is past us in Froch vs Dirrell. I really don't want to see Taylor continue, for his healths sake. What was agreed on as far as replacing a fighter who cant continue?
     
  5. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    That's right...he took it much better than most of the people on this forum. My goodness...what a bunch of babies!!
     
  6. Jan(DK)

    Jan(DK) Joined april 2007 Full Member

    3,454
    0
    Jun 29, 2008
    :good
     
  7. jordan1

    jordan1 Juan Lopez #1 Full Member

    11,491
    30
    Jun 20, 2009
    They just like watching him suck that dick, Yep I guess carl made a deal with the judge's and the ref, let me win and ill suck your dicks...:hey
     
  8. Borat

    Borat Member Full Member

    136
    0
    Sep 13, 2008
    You will always have bad "stylistic" match-up when you have someone running all night, hugging, falling down untouched, and constantly disrupting flow of the game. The way to avoid this match-up is not to invite the guy with style like that to the tournament. Watch for this poor stylistic match in his every fight. Can't believe Showtime let that happen.
     
  9. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    What are you? The refs wife:rofl:lol:
     
  10. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,264
    94
    Apr 30, 2008
    The ref should have taken points away from Froch!
     
  11. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004
    :good
     
  12. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    Guys...this was in no way a robbery.

    In reality, Dirrell made a better showing than most expected. This does not translate into Dirrell decisively winning the fight.

    It was an ugly, boring, stinker of a fight...which could have gone either way....hence the split decision.

    I really can't believe that most on this forum have a serious problem with the decision.
     
  13. Alcaldemb

    Alcaldemb Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,343
    19
    Mar 4, 2006
    Sounds like sour grapes to me. I thought the Abraham vs Taylor fight was pretty entertaining with Jermain ahead after four and Abraham taking control from round five on. That KO was spectacular, but even if he hadn't scored it no way Jermain should have gotten the nod.

    As far as Froch vs Dirrell I thought it was a rather sloppy fight from both of them, and neither fighter really shied away from questionable tactics. I would have been fine with either fighter getting the nod, or the fight being scored a draw as it was relatively close and neither fighter really established themselves.
     
  14. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Jul 4, 2007
    Victor Ortiz?.. c'mon.. the kids got bags of talent.. just needs to mature..
     
  15. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    Who are you, Dirrell's wife?:verysad