Froch vs Dirrell controversy thread

You don't want to hear why he lost the fight. Bottom line.

I hope Dirrell wants to know why he lost....for his sake.

 

You won't say why he lost the fight or just as important, why Froch won it. Your ducking questions and babbling bull**** about the judges opinions even though you don't know **** about why they scored the fight the way they did.

If you'd like to get back on track, Dirrell severely outlanded Froch and had him hurt at least once. That is why Dirrell won the fight. Square that with a Froch victory. Or babble some more like I know you will.

 

You are saying that he lost the fight because the people who decide who wins the fight decided that he did not win the fight. That is a tautology. You are not saying anything. If you cannot make a statement with any content then do not make a statement.

 

Dirrell lost the fight because he did too much running, falling over and complaining.....judges don't like that in title fights.

Froch won the fight because of his aggression and willingness to engage.......judges like that in title fights.

Now that I've answered your question (for the second time), let me ask you one:

What do think Dirrell can learn from this fight to take with him and progress his career?

 

See my above post. If you had paid attention you would see this is the SECOND time I have said why Dirrell lost and Froch won.

Why do you think Dirrell lost, by the way?

 

Dirrell and his team know why he lost... they said it during the fight: "...you're not going to get a decision here...". Dirrell had to knock Froch out, he was in for a diffirent challenge away in nottingham, and he had to do something extraordinary to win there. Dirrell can however be satisfied after all he did show how he was better than Froch in many aspects of boxing. It wasn't a perfect fight for Dirrell, but then again it's hard to fight away with all the odds against you in a hostile environment.

 

Dirrell clearly outboxed Froch over 12 rounds. Dirrell should be WBC champ.

 

I had Dirrell up 114-113. An ugly fight to watch and score.

 

Dirrell with ease !!

Froch was made to look like a 1 dimensional plodder ..Dirrell just lost based on where the fight was it had nothing to do with Froch's aggression ..

 

Dirrell fought a bull**** fight. Kept running in looking like he wanted a hug or a sniff of Froch's armpits. Then diving about the floor and complaining like he'd just been pushed over when he hadn't(though Froch did slam him down once).

The commentary was bull**** for a lot of the fight too. They completely had a hard on for Dirrell.

It was close and Dirrell hit him with some decent shots but I gave it to Froch 114-113, without the point deduction a draw.

 

check out campillo vs shumenov horrible scoring

 

You cant just try to run past an opponent, a boxer moves laterally and jabs is way out of a corner. You cant just punch from so far away that you fall as you are throwing the punch. You cant make sidestep so big that your out of position.

Dont play smart and tell that you know boxing, he as a shitty thechnique.

 

well well well