Froch vs Dirrell

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Dec 28, 2009.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    How bad a decision does everyone really think it was?
    I thought the fight could have gone either way but in the only 2 fight reports I read on the match, (in Boxing News and The Ring) both had Froch a close winner. Maybe it wasnt a robbery after all and more of just a close bout where patriotism is blinding opinions.
    What you think?
     
  2. richie leon

    richie leon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,512
    1
    Jan 21, 2008
    Ofcourse it wasn't really a robbery. But if patriotism wasn't blinding opinions, something else would be doing it, believe that lol. There aren't an abundance of neutral, clear-seeing opinions available in this game brother.

    As for your assesment of the fight, i totally agree. I saw Dirrell as a close winner, but it all depends on what you like. Don't expect the majority of opinions on this subject to be like that, though;)
     
  3. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    It robbed us all of about a hour of our lives
     
  4. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    It was a fight that didn't really deserve a winner. Dirrell showed flashes of brilliance that suggest he could have won the fight clearly if he had committed to winning. Froch showed determination but landed very little in terms of clean punches. The decision was bad in my opinion, but understandable.
     
  5. zulander

    zulander Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,851
    1,518
    Mar 17, 2006
    Dirrell would have won the fight except for the point deduction and the fact he didnt throw enuff. He lost rounds because it looked like froch was forcing the fight as Dirrell was running around the ring and not punching enuff. I thought Dirrell should have gotten the win but i can understand how he didnt
     
  6. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    The Ring article states unequivocally that Dirrell got robbed. No ifs ands or buts. However, on fight night The Ring had it for Froch. I'm not sure what sense that makes, but I guess that's boxing in a nutshell.
     
  7. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    I agree. Although I do think the decision went in Froch's favor more as a result of the disdain for Dirrell's fight tactics as opposed to anything Froch did in the fight. Dirrell landed the better punches despite his tactics, but most found them too distasteful. But I found the point deduction against Dirrell strange. I found it just a bit odd that with all the questionable actions by the fighters during the fight, that the ref decided at that time to deduct a point. After all the holding and falling by Dirrell and the rabbit punching and a blatant body slam by Froch, that that deserved a point?
     
  8. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    I beleive Dirrell won but in a championship fight you must take it from the champ ..Froch has been very lucky and his luck is going to run out against the Viking Warrior ..
     
  9. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Why Dirrell lost the fight!

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY[/ame]
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    got the Ring mag info on Jan 2010 issue under feature (semi super start to super six) starts on page 34. Says on page 39 The Ring made it 114-113 for Froch
     
  11. Gsand

    Gsand Active Member Full Member

    1,407
    0
    Dec 13, 2004
    Close fight. Whiners are mostly just playing home nation games.
     
  12. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005
    yep, it was a terrible fight to watch but dirrel made it that way. no way dirrel did enough to take someones belt on that shameful performance.
     
  13. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    My thoughts exactly!
     
  14. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    Dirrell was robbed, but they had it for Froch. :huh
     
  15. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    Alright y'all...I'm gonna take one for the team and watch the whole fight again right now to see how I score it. Maybe I'm just a masochist, but at least I'm helping you guys out. I had it for 115-112 Dirrell last time, with three rounds questionable (so a draw would have been reasonable to me).

    Heeeere goes...