Froch vs. Dirrell

Michigan Warrior is a ****ing idiot. He drones on and on about how that ***** Dirrell Ruiz-Bolt should have won the fight and yet ignores the fact that eveyone who watched the fight can see, that Dirrell turned in a pathetic performance that night and showed no interest whatsoever in fighting, but concentrated almost exclusively on running, holding, complaining, and falling over.

Had that close fight been awarded to Dirrell, then we all might as well have given up if boxing had sunk that low. It was a **** fight, but Dirrell lost it, more than Froch won it.At least Froch tried to fight.Dirrell was disgraceful and should have been disqualified anyway

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Dirrells win?

Had he won it on his feet fighting the 11 and 12 rd like a man. Yes

Pure fact remains that in the 11 he was walking around like he was drunk on ***** street. And was looking a prime victim for a KO.

Then taking a easy way out by winning a fight flat on his back faking a KO.....hmmmmm

great win that!

 

It's Fun to Beat Up David UK! David UKeheheh. Did you notice I used your pic with Wlad in the Welliver vs Wladimir call out video? I even label your sorry ass.

If the fight has to (and it does) go to Froch, your statement is correct. Dirrell lost it more than Froch won it.

That was Andre's 1st step up in class to the elite level. He did not know how far above elite he was. He ran too much early even though it was effective with Froch hitting air while getting pot shotted here and there. He also held a bit too much.

In the fight the point was ridiculous. Froch had gotten away with a ton without gettting a point taken. There should have never been any points involved.

The whole key to the fight is how you scored the rounds when Dirrell was on the run.....did you favor an agressive Froch even though he never landed anything at all.....or did you favor Dirrell effectively using his ring generalship to produce superior defense?

The 1 thing that pisses me off the most is that the same people who are all about Froch winning cause Dirrell ran and did nothing, have no damn problem backing up David Haye running and doing nothing while Valuev chased and put the jab on him.

Same Clowns....Using Both Sides Of The Coin :bbb

 

Froch was more impressive against common opponent Arthur, despite styles favouring Dirrell more.

 

Dirrell did run and do nothing, so did David Haye against SNV and Haye should've lost.

P.S. Rotherham is in England