froch vs golovkin must happen

I prefer judging by resume wins rather than technical ability - what the boxer has achieved, not just their skill-level. Ward and Froch are top 10 p4p. Golovkin has a worse resume then Froch - this is undoubted in boxing circles.

 

Standing up for your boyfriend again Fibbs.

You and your boyfriend call him all the names under the sun, how is that stating technical differences.

He beat groves....deal with it !!!

 

I remember those technical differences against Groves. Funny how that one panned out.

 

Golovkin savages Froch. Groves exposed his flaws in the first fight as did the likes of Dirrell. He was also outclassed by Taylor until he pulled the win out the bag. Golovkin is much more skilled than all of those guys.

Big credit to Froch if he takes this.

 

froch can take far too much damage to make fighting golovkin a good idea. it's not impossible that he could keep ggg off with a long jab and hope to capitalize on his elite stamina, we don't know how ggg performs late on.

carl's chin is great, but i see ggg working the body against a longer fighter, and carl's the type to take too much punishment and keep coming. he should take chavez in vegas for the money and occasion, ward in england if he can or degale if he can't and retire.

 

Like I said before, I rate GGG.. every time I watch him fight he looks even more special. But fact of the matter is he hasn't been in with or beaten a truly WORLD CLASS fighter as of yet, not to say he won't because I'm pretty sure he will.