***FROCH vs JOHNSON REJECTED BY SKY*** Froch responds to fans

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Big Dunk, Mar 25, 2011.


  1. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Yeah, I just forgot about that myself.

    It would, so I think we should forget the argument of getting him on PPV because no matter how much complaining we do, we won't get him on a seperate PPV.

    Froch/Johnson should be able to get onto regular Sky, at the least, as ishy said.
     
  2. cheekyvid

    cheekyvid Detroit, I shall return. Full Member

    7,324
    3
    Nov 4, 2009
    True that fat Mick has done carl **** moneywise and publicity wise but it shows the character of froch that he's just got on with it. Frochs run of fights will be remembered as the highest standard fights in a stretch for a long long time by a Brit. Would he have this chance without fat Mick?

    Frochs misfortune has been the making of him really, with a bigger promoter he wouldn't have the respect he does from real boxing fans, although more fannnys would know him and he'd have more money.
    Depends what you want really...you can look at it this way:
    FM delivered a WBC belt, big opponents and a chance to regain the title. So whilst he isquite ****, he ain't totally useless
     
  3. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    lol your a joke
     
  4. Scottrf

    Scottrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,547
    0
    May 1, 2010
    Lazarus, I think what you are alluding to is that Warren/Khan had a 5 fight deal with SBO, which ran out before the Malignaggi fight? Ran from Prescott to Salita. So while Malignaggi may have been the reason it wasn't on Box Office (along with the start time), you are trying to say if that hadn't run out he would have been PPV regardless?
     
  5. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    **** the delayed broadcast froch is a proven fighter not a punchbag like hatton

    better still leave it on primetime so we can watch it live:good
     
  6. cheekyvid

    cheekyvid Detroit, I shall return. Full Member

    7,324
    3
    Nov 4, 2009
    Fat Mick has him through the super6, all promoters have their fighters through it, hnce why kessler chucked palle b4hand to join kalle sourkraut
     
  7. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    There you go, but as a Fan, I don't know what's entirely true out of that, but what you've said is the summary of what I've been trying to say.
     
  8. Lunny

    Lunny Guest

    That's true but the only reason the viewing figures wouldn't be high is because most people don't really know who he is. The only reason for that is because Sky haven't been buying up his fights and selling them. It's a bit of a circle.
     
  9. Scottrf

    Scottrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,547
    0
    May 1, 2010
    Would be hard to believe they considered the Salita fight a better one, I think they regretted the multi fight PPV deal.
     
  10. badlefthook84

    badlefthook84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,968
    2
    Apr 19, 2010
    Not defending Sky here but Hennessy has to pull the finger out and at least get a date and venue nailed on first and foremost. Sky can't commit to anything otherwise. Wouldn't be surprised to see it end up on regular sky. Really pissed off though hearing this news in light of reading yesterday an article by Glyn Leach in boxing monthly saying that Sky are paying both DeGale and Groves's purses on May 21st, Coldwell not paying a penny despite submitting the winning bid. Sky paying their ****ing purses!!! If Smith had the final say on this and gave it the ok then he should resign because he is out of his depth or if it wasn't his decision then you would wonder how much power he has in his new position if they are going over his head with **** like that anyway.
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    Perhaps they havn't been buying them because Mick Hennessy has done a **** of a job promoting him? Therefore the figures don't stack up. After all, they backed him when he was a prospect coming up so its not personal.

    He kind of has himself to blame for tying himself down with that useless, fat sack of shite.
     
  12. Funtime Frankie

    Funtime Frankie Member Full Member

    330
    0
    Dec 9, 2009
    Very good point there pal. We all know what Fwank Warren is like, can you see him letting Froch fight this long run of good fighters? very doubtful. Maybe the idiot micks incompetence has helped Froch on the legacy side to true boxing fans. Although he obv is not earning the reddies he could have been. Bit of six of one/half dozen of the other scenario.
     
  13. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,556
    828
    Nov 13, 2008
    Hennessy promotions are a joke sorry to say.

    If Carl was with Sky few years back then would have a TV following under them and so they would have been backing him, seems like Sky dont want to invest in Carl at this stage of his career, hope i am wrong for his future fights.
     
  14. Joan_Guzman

    Joan_Guzman Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,244
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    It will be a **** fight. Froch versus a solid gatekeeper. WD to sky for not showing this poor excuse of a fight.
     
  15. badlefthook84

    badlefthook84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,968
    2
    Apr 19, 2010
    When Smith tried to justify the Haye-Harrison farce of a ppv by saying we got our moneys worth by getting to see the build up to it and hearing from Lewis and Bruno on fight night, i wanted to punch him in the mouth. Should of known then it was a sign of things to come.