Froch vs. Kessler II - "WARRIORS CALL" - AFTERMATH AND BREAKDOWN THREAD

Last weekend confimed that statement.
Only Dirrell fought so extremely negative, I was glad they didn't give him the nod (I had him winning by a point).

 

Absolute nonsense, he was in fantastic shape as he proved on the night.

Also how do you know he is mentally and spiritually focused, this time around? :-(

 

Agreed. When Dirrell just stood infront of Froch and exchanged with him he made Carl look ordinary and he even hurt him in the 11th and 12th rounds. If he'd been a little more confident in himself and mentally stable he would have won the fight easily and may even have stopped Froch.

 

For someone called BoxingAnalyst you're **** at analysing fights.

Anyway it's a predicion thread and i'm giving my prediction, if you disagree then that's okay but we'll see on May 25th.

 

Yeah. My prediction - you're going to look a bit of a tit. :good

 

Oh yeah just like i did for my Rigo-Donaire, Alvarez-Trout and Gonzalez-Burns predictions!

I think not.

 

No, this has nothing to do with who your tipping to win, you said Kessler is spiritually and mentally focused? Please explain how you know this? And why wasn't he the same for they're first encounter? And also explain why Kessler wasn't in shape in they're first bout..yet he went 12 rounds at a gruelling pace and was getting stronger as the fight went on, even though he took a fair bit of punishment?

 

Cool. See you on the 26th.

 

****ing hell, get a grip of yourself you arrogant tosser.

 

I'm the arrogant tosser? how do you work that one out.

I'm not the one who is mocking others posts on a prediction thread. I made my prediction and a few reasons why and i don't attack anyone else for their predictions even if i completely disagree with them.

I am respectful of others posts on here...no point attacking someone for a prediction on a fight that hasn't even taken place yet so chill out.

 

I didn't attack you at all, I asked you to explain, yet you had no answer. You call me a **** analyst yet you rank Terrence Crawford as the number 4 Lightweight and Burns at 5. :good

 

If Carl wins then cool, i just don't think he will win.

Look i'm a massive Mattyhse supporter, he's one of my favourite current boxers to watch but i think he'll lose to Peterson at the weekend and have made my prediction that he will lose on points based on their respective style match-up...i hope i'm wrong though as would like nothing better then to see Peterson knocked out.

 

Froch 8-4

 

Well i was just joking so calm down, i'm sure your a good boxing analyst and know your stuff.

I rated Crawford at Number 4 on pure talent and skills alone, obviously his resume dosen't justify that spot at the moment but i think a year from now he'll be the clear number 1 in a division especially as HBO want to turn him into their next big star and from what i've seen of him he will live up to those expectations. Also Burns looked totally outclassed on saturday so moving him to number 5 wasn't a difficult decision.

 

You picked Gonzalez to win via TKO, why would you make that up?


[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?p=15354396#post15354396[/url]