I think he's more of a wind up merchant Wallet....Relentless i think picked up on it in GF a while back during a thread. To think i felt sorry for him.......now he's becoming a troll...
I thought I'd test the water, Mand. I had a look at whether he could stand up to rational debate and look at things objectively. He failed.
No all that stick what Khan fans used to get back when i joined, No Mandanda you got me wrong. Its pay back time with interest/spiced up
:good As soon as i saw the name Salita he scored a epic O.G and then tried worm way out of it. He never learns...Flea ripped him to shreds after he used the ''inches wins fights'' theory.....then he's back with it..
Fair Enough Darni...all about opinions as they say even if we disagree a fair bit on all things Khan. :thumbsup
Laws of nature dont change, Bradley 5'6 Khan 5'10 thats a 4in reach advantage has plus his handspeed, from range footwork, and jab. You guys say Bradley will slip and come inside, remember when standing you can set up uppercuts, right hands after a missed jab, Bradley will get in time to time, but Khan will out punch and out point him more from the outside. That is all i am saying, if you fail to understand my view then i cant help you. I stand by my view, your might differ cool, we will se who is right on fight night if Bradley get past Alexander that is.
Exactly! All this "He did it to prove the critics wrong and prove his chin" is a load of nonsense. Khan fought like that and was in that type of fight because he was forced to and didn't know how to make it easier. The idea that he purposely took punches is just ludicrous. The kid was almost out on his feet for crying out loud.
Darni....Bradley will offset Khan with feints and good footwork and keep stepping to him. If Khan falls in with his shots he will make him pay with sharp counters. The fact he's smaller isn't to big a deal...Bradley will be compact and make Khan reach in. Khan can outwork him via hit thin air....cos Bradley's not that easy to hit and the fact he can dictate at mid-close range and even long range he can frustrate Khan...it's his fight imo.
Again thats your opinion i respect it but i disagree, i dont feel Khan will be the one reaching in, Bradley will be from the first bell. You say he will make Khan miss, i think Khan accuracy in his last few fights is improving and he is not wasting as many shots as he used to, saying and doing is two different things, the speed his shots come at Bradley will have problems sliping them any fighter will. This content is protected
I actually think Khan and Bradley are pretty close in terms of their ring record/competition faced and beat. This content is protected Andriy Kotelnik UD Paul Malignaggi TKO11 Marcus Maidana UD Marco Antonio Barrera TD5 This content is protected Lamont Peterson UD Kendall Holt UD Junior Witter SD12 Edner Cherry UD Luis Abregu UD If I put them in order, it would be something like this: This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
I think you underrate the Witter win a fair bit here. That is possibly the best win of the lot because Witter was confident, at home, had everything going for him in the fight. He wasn't the same fighter against Alexander a year and a half later in the US, his confidence was in a different place.
I'd agree with this. I think Witter's confidence was shattered after the defeat. It was more convincing then a split decision imo. I remember that night.....no one expected Bradley to do what he did. He even holds a win over Miguel Vazquez. He's fought some very good fighters over a 4 year period.
You're probably right. Its a hard task to seperate those top six, I feel. I wouldn't argue with Witter being put top.