Froch vs Oosthuizen?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by P.I. STAKER, Jul 19, 2012.

  1. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    14,011
    Likes Received:
    3
    you want my REAL opinon?

    Ok, Pavlik is done, his career ended midway through the Martinez fight, he checked out mentally and that was that. people call Froch limited, and that may be so, on a skills level, maybe Froch and Pavlik are around equal, maybe.

    the difference is, Froch finds a way to win most times, where Pavlik does not.

    Froch was able to bounce back from defeats, Pavlik was not.

    Froch has been active at the highest level, Pavlik has not.

    Froch is rightfully ranked at the top end of the division, Pavlik is not

    Froch is relevent, Pavlik is not.


    I have no problem with the fight IF it happens, but Pavlik hasn't earned it, he hasn't earned ****, he's after a payday.

    If Pavlik really wants to get back to the top he'll take the fights he needs to to get there, against contenderd, not domestic level club fighters. He's trying to take the Chris Arreloa route, that's garbage man, that aint no warrior ****, thats just ****. And they do it because they know they aint beating no contender, and another loss ends them for good. They just trying to get a run together against soft touches, get an inflated ranking, get a payday.

    Pavlik vs Bika, winner gets Froch.

    i'd be happy with that.
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,577
    Likes Received:
    3,768
    Froch late stoppage. wow I had no idea the Pavs fight wasn't happening.
     
  3. P.I. STAKER

    P.I. STAKER Guest

    thats the thing, pavlik hasnt been tested yet at the higher level - so to say hes done or hasnt bounced back is bull****

    froch would be the perfect test for pavlik right now, and i think if pavlik still has that fire in him that he did at the elite level - he beats froch

    froch is taking the easy route right now by avoiding pavlik - bc i think froch knows theres a very good chance he could lose that fight...
     
  4. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    44,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    Nah, Froch is gonna shut him up. :rofl None of these guys had any trouble with Froch talking **** and calling out Pavlik when Kelly was still a MW. Now Kelly isn't worthy? Why? Cuz he moved up to SMW and put on the muscle. :deal
     
  5. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    5,669
    Likes Received:
    12
    They said Dirrell hasn't earned a shot. now everyone is content with this nobody -_-
     
  6. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    15,628
    Likes Received:
    30
    In his defense, I wouldn't exactly call Sierra a bum. I would agree that he's taking a big step up to fight Froch.
     
  7. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    15,628
    Likes Received:
    30
    I think even the harshest Froch critic would agree that he is above test level. With that said, Edwin Rodriguez would be a perfect test of how much progress Kelly has made under Garcia's tutelage.
    I'm not sure if Pavlik's team will go for that ,though, as there's a better than decent chance that Edwin will make Kelly look really average and ruin any blockbuster fights that may or may not be on the horizon.
     
  8. Froch is not a test for pavlik he is one of the hardest opponents Kelly would have ever fought second only to Hopkins

    That's not a test its a recipe for another ****
     
  9. Kampioni

    Kampioni Good Boy Full Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,850
    Likes Received:
    10
    War Froch
     
  10. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    14,011
    Likes Received:
    3
    No and No

    Boxing is a proving ground and he hasn't proven that he has the RIGHT to facr Froch yet.

    calling Froch a duck is just utterly ridiculous and I think you know it.
     
  11. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,585
    Likes Received:
    6
    Froch would beat Pavlik but he is not or never has been good as Sergio, who beat Pavlik badly, when he was outweighed by over 15 lbs.
     
  12. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    14,011
    Likes Received:
    3
    Froch would beat Martinez. It's a size thing more than a skill thing, Martinez is a blown up welterweight, he went into the trenches against Barker and Maklin who Froch would utterly decimate, i'm not saying Froch is better p4p but head to head he's a harder fight than Martinez
     
  13. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    22,661
    Likes Received:
    4
    i would have been so happy to see Pavlik beat the **** out of Stevenson....I'd give Pavlik a good chance vs Bute too, I'd slightly favout Bute but Pavlik would be a live dog. Vs froch though I just don't see Pavlik standing much of a chance..... I agree that he's way more proven on the world stage than Oothuizen but the Oosthuizen is kind of an unknown at this level and has a bunch of question marks around,, maybe he proves he's the **** maybe he flops, with Pavlik we all mostly feel Froch wins handily.
     
  14. Fighting a golfer !! Doesn't seem like a fair fight to me

    This content is protected
     
  15. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    14,011
    Likes Received:
    3
    This content is protected


    FORE!

    This content is protected