Froch VS Steve Collins, Eubank, BENN

But you are basing your opinion on Froch's wins over guys not nearly as good as Benn, Collins or Eubank. Froch had trouble/arguably lost to Dirrell, Groves, Taylor, actually lost to a faded Kessler, and didn't even have it all his own way against Glen Johnson, all of who are not on the level of Benn, Collins and Eubank. But still some think Froch would beat any of those 3, sorry I don't see it. Apart from Ward, Froch's division is not great and he still struggles.

 

mid90s was best time for smw so far.

 

i dont see froch getting ko'd like everyone thinks he will. eubanks was hardly a devasting puncher, nor was collins. benn would be the only man to be able to ko froch from the british smw's, and he'd also be most vulnerable.

either way there all close fights, eubanks would be the best bet because hes the better counter puncher, with a granite jaw.

 

Well we agree on something then, I doubt any of the 3 would ko Froch.

 

Out of the bunch, Froch is the one with the poorest defense skills.
When hurt, he doesn't know what to do, and often runs into more punches.
The list of fighters who buckled his legs in endless.

But since he never faced a world class offensive machine, people are fooled.

 

He would give Eubank, Collins and Benn hell even if he loses. I would pick him over Collins and Benn, but it's a 50/50 fight against Eubank.

 

Benn never stopped anybody worth talking about at 168.