Why, because i predicted that froch would keep groves on the end of his jab, then KHTFO ? Do you want me to link the post where i said that ? Why dont you post the link to where you predicted Froch would KO Groves ? Walter ****in Mitty Do you want me to tell you what you said ?
Well done you predicted Froch to win, what do you want a knighthood. And I don't recall saying Groves would win. I may have said how I can see he could win, but I cannot recall posting on here any prediction. If I'm wrong I'm wrong but please post where I've obviously stated that Groves would beat Froch.
Re: Froch vs Groves. Who do you want and think will win? I want Groves to win but I think Froch will pull it out of the bank again. Never liked Froch, excellent fighter HOF bound but an arrogant insecure *****. Oh here Two Shakes I found this in my posting history.
Why did you look if you knew you'd picked Froch ? :rofl No confidence in your prediction ? What you should have said is .... " I ****in hate Froch and his fans, and i'm praying that fat George pulls off a miracle and beats the big nose **** " Froch is the Andy Murray of British boxing, quite clearly the best and doing the biz at the top level, but doesn't have the educated PR head to sell himself to the general public. Fact is British public don't like winners, we like " nice " losers.
I know Froch makes 168 easily but he has the size to carry off 175 if he wanted too. Always wondered why he never moved up or talked about it.
Having seen some of your comments and picks, you'd be the last **** i'd ask if i was visiting the bookies. Another Froch hater. Please enlighten us clueless mortals on which British SMW's have surpassed Carls acheivements ? This should be a laugh.
Have a word with yourself. Pavlik walked around at 185 - 190 and fought at 160. Froch walks around at 170 - 175 yet he should be fighting at 175 ? Comedy gold this place. atsch
The issue here is the weight and how it effects Froch, if at all. Froch maybe a bit like Hatton where he has one weight and moving up May not suit him because he is such a beast at 68. Ultimately, moving to 175 is a hell of a lot more interesting that Degale or Chavez. I think the Stevenson fight is very winnable. Fonfara had him out on his feet and Stevenson has all the hallmarks of a fighter who would struggle down the stretch. Froch would probably lose the early rounds and take a fee bombs, but you have to back his chin. Can't see a 37 year old Superman lasting 12 with Froch tbh. I think Froch is so confident in the championship rounds now he would literally stalk him into a TKO.
At what point did I say he should be fighting at 175 Lee? I never said he should what I said was I am surprised he never tried it out as he has the frame to carry it off, I.e put on the extra muscle without causing him any problems. It's wankers like you Lee who are causing posters to defect to other boxing forums you Carl Froch knob jockey. What you seem to want everyone to do is praise Carl Froch yet not criticise or have an opinion you don't agree with.
Hopkins can only fight for 30-60 seconds a round, so would have no chance v Froch who can fight at a quick pace for 36 minutes. Hopkins needs to control pace, wouldn't v Froch who would wear him down in second half of fight and would knock Hopkins out