From an objective view point. If Manny Pacquaio did beat Mayweather

Yup. The same argument these haters use when Pac defeated an "over the hill, past it, been in too many wars" 29 year old Barerra and Morales.

:nut

 

I've formed my own opinions and backed it up with some facts.

You? Just personal attacks.

You mad? That's a sure sign of weakness and even defeat in forums.

:hi:

 

which is not the same as boxing as a pro. and if you count whole life, pac started fighting in town fiestas as early as age 11 or 12 without proper equipment and guidance from expert coaches.

 

ahhh man after typing all that the thread has degraded....

 

Look *******... Why did I break Pac's resume down? Because people like you overrate him. I assure you, if Pac didn't have fans like you, he'd have more people on his side, but arrogant fans like you, who just started watching boxing in 2005, and come here talking all this **** about past greats to hype up Pac, and talking **** to people because they are not fooled by the Arum machine and it pisses you off that not EVERYONE sees Pac as GOD like you do and the rest of the *******s do.... Pac is a good fighter in this era, one of the best of this weak era. But imo he never took the test when he was called out on it and when he was looking unstoppable, that puts a question mark over his resume, considering how easy it is to juice nowadays....

FFS he walked away from negotiations against Floyd because of the OSDT request!!!!!!! Sorry but Pac is only doing this to himself, and his raging mad minions like you who obsess over Pac don't do him any favors with the hardcore fans.

And I'll break down Pac's resume anytime, it's actually not that hard. And we can compare it to the past greats, and Pac's resume isn't on their level.

 

Agenda confessed. Wants to break down Pac's resume but not others.

Damn, that was easy!

Hate the fans, not the fighter.

:hi:

 

sparring is not even comparable to actual fights. sparring is a controlled environment. pac would be pitted against other kids, sometimes older than him and gets an equivalent of $2 for this. started pro at age 16 fighting against other pros who are grown man already most of the time. and floyd's style allows him not to get hit much often while pac's style is to come forward, take some hits to unload his own. it's really not hard to guess who would be better at an older age between the two.

 

If you want to get a more objective view than just one persons why not go onto the IBRO website and see what a collection of boxing experts think?

Their ratings are about 5 years old but they're an impressive bunch.

http://www.ibroresearch.com/


A guy named Monte Cox also has an excellent website and it a member of the IBRO.

 

Thanks for the link. I'll take a look at it when I get home from work. :good

 

oh Puga. atsch

 

I can't believe this is still going on. atsch

I won't ask, both the *****s and *******s invaded the thread.