Fury and Arum Holding Up Fury-Usyk, They Don't Think Usyk Deserves 50%

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Perkin Warbeck, Jan 16, 2023.


Should Usyk Receive 50%?

Poll closed Oct 11, 2025.
  1. Yes of course, he's already a legend and has 4 world titles

    75.6%
  2. No, Arum is right, he doesn't deserve 50%, he should accept less

    24.4%
  1. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,291
    May 7, 2016
    I wonder whats wrong with Germany, K2 Often staged large events there with Klitschko.
    Since some say Usyk is such a super draw, he should have no problems bringing Fury to Dusseldorf like Wlad did.

    Unless ofcourse, Usyk isnt the draw AJ fans say he is, and Krassyuk is right about Fury being the big tickets seller. Then it makes complete sense why Fury and the Saudis chasing Oleksadnr, and not the other way around.

    For all his skill and tremendous accomplishments, Usyk hasnt been able to draw a good enough fan base, so the 50% he's holding out for is truly bizarre considering the financially driven boxing world we live in.

    If Saturday comes and Usyk walks away, despite all of Usyks intentions and previous record, the duck will be hard to defend.
     
    MAD_PIGE0N likes this.
  2. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,291
    20,763
    Jul 2, 2006
    Come on Fury. Sign it. We are going to be missing out on an ATG fight.
     
    Gareth Priest likes this.
  3. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,291
    May 7, 2016
    Its Usyk holding out buddy, see Krassyuk. He's told us everything we all needed to know. Its 50% for Usyk, or he waddles away.
     
  4. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,291
    20,763
    Jul 2, 2006
    I am not sure if Fury will even agree to 40% for Usyk.
     
    Gareth Priest likes this.
  5. MAD_PIGE0N

    MAD_PIGE0N ... banned Full Member

    2,595
    1,968
    Sep 3, 2022
    I don't want to discuss over what we discuss in like at least one new "Fury-Usyk" topic every week (apart from one "Fury" per week), the point is - regardless one likes or dislikes Fury, what is it: Fury avoids Usyk or Fury is greedy? As it seems it's not both even if he, let's say truly avoids Usyk and is greedy, the money doesn't seem to be the reason in this case. And if he intends not to fight him - fine, it's for him. He still has the AJ and Joyce option or shame himself. Usyk can try Joyce or Ruiz and retire, as his heavyweight legacy is nothing, but him, being ATG is valid because of his cruiser career.

    By the way, Fury not wanting Whyte isn't valid, he was right not to be rushing for this clown or give him the amount of money Whyte wanted - he knocked him out without even sweating. (I'd argue that saying Fury was afraid of Ustinov who got badly beaten by Pulev isn't serious.)

    For what I am underlining in your quote: Usyk has the chance to trap Fury and say "ok belly, I am giving you 60:40" - this will really put Fury in the corner, yes? Why not doing it, I am serious, it'll be nice to do and we'll see how Fury will manage.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2023
    Gareth Priest likes this.
  6. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,291
    May 7, 2016
    If that was the case, I wouldnt be impressed either. 40% for Usyk is fair to me, I could squeeze 45 just to get it over the line. But if Fury wants more, I'd shake my head. Just like I do over Olesksandr at the minute.
     
  7. spravedlivylev

    spravedlivylev Haaaappy Neeeew Yeeeear! banned Full Member

    1,636
    3,300
    Nov 17, 2022
    Apparently, Usyk was offered 30% which is an insult. To me, it boggles the mind that many Fury fans actually believe Usyk is greedy for not agreeing to such ridiculous terms while being the unified HW champion of the world. Absolute madness.
     
    Gareth Priest likes this.
  8. MAD_PIGE0N

    MAD_PIGE0N ... banned Full Member

    2,595
    1,968
    Sep 3, 2022
    Tricky actually, he's offered 30% if he loses the fight. I agree this is low, but on the other hand, many if not most, believe he'll win in which case is promised 40% (John Fury's words, let's assume this is really the offer). Usyk took 40 against Chisora however, took 50:50 being the champ in his second Joshua fight. I am not sure, but in their first Usyk took like 30% indeed.

    I know all of this might sound like advocating Fury - no, I don't. I'm really bored of him not fighting top ones. The Wilder trilogy was good, deserved to be a trilogy. He fought Whyte, relatively a top one - good, but now what? Chisora III was a shame and everything different than Usyk, AJ, Joyce or Ruiz will be so.
     
  9. Finkel

    Finkel Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,384
    5,297
    Feb 10, 2020
    In the interview you speak of, I'm sure you also heard Krassyuk talk about their promotional successes with Usyk, from breaking records in Kiev to travelling the world and recent successes in both London and Saudi Arabia. How he understands that while Usyk has a lot of UK fans that it's obvious Fury will have the crowd behind him with the fight being in the UK instead of Saudi. His main message was that this is a global event. So if Fury is expecting home advantage for undisputed, then he pays 50-50 for that advantage (fair enough given Fury didn't accept the Saudi offer).

    Seemingly that is something that 75% of voters in this thread's poll agree with. Fury is going to look bad if they can't get this fight over the line. For obvious reasons.
     
  10. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,291
    May 7, 2016
    He's been offered 40%, John Furys idea was the 30% if he loses, but thats not how it is... As John said, "Being the great champion Tyson is, it would have to be 60/40"

    60/40 and Usyk is still going to duck. Dispbicable.
     
  11. spravedlivylev

    spravedlivylev Haaaappy Neeeew Yeeeear! banned Full Member

    1,636
    3,300
    Nov 17, 2022
    Kudos for your words of reason.

    I think Usyk took the lower percentages so far because what Krassyuk has said about him is true: he is interested in legacy first and accepting lower percentages meant he could progress in his career, not getting into back and forth with contracts. He wants to be paid too, of course, but the way Krassyuk put it: Usyk believes in the principle of "do not chase money because if you perform well in the ring, money will follow". I'm quite sure most fighters would have already got into contract controversies over the split against Chisora or AJ. Usyk's goal has always been to become undisputed in HW too and I think he saw arguing over percentages as roadblocks that waste time.

    But now, it's different for two reasons. First, this is the last stop in his historical journey. This is for the undisputed HW title, going into battle as the unified HW champion of the world. That's a whole different status, the stakes are on a whole new level. The second reason is: he was already happy with the Saudi deal, which he accepted and signed. And now he is being dragged out of that deal and put to a serious disadvantage by the new location being Fury's backyard. To me, it seems that it's about principle for Usyk. Not necessarily about the amount of money but the idea of "you don't push me around - you don't want the Saudi deal, you make me fight in London, fine - but then whatever we'll make, I want half, it's only fair".

    That said, my last hope for this fight is that Usyk calls Fury's bluff and says "you know what, fine - take whatever percentage you want, but I want a rematch clause" - and in case he wins, he could have the leverage to negotiate about the purse for the rematch. I firmly believe that no matter what he says, Fury will duck him, but I'd still have this last bit of hope that he calls Fury's bluff by agreeing to the terms in the end. I totally understand where he comes from with this idea of not wanting to give in about the 50/50 split, and he is totally justified to think so. I won't hold it against him if he doesn't, but I still hope he will call Fury's bluff in the end.
     
    Gareth Priest and Perkin Warbeck like this.
  12. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,291
    May 7, 2016
    You mean like AJ did to Usyk, come on Finkel, Give me a break. You know thats not how buisness works.
    If Usyk has so many fans, wheres his offer to Fury?? There is none! Because Usyk needs Fury more than Fury needs Usyk when it comes to the money. And sadly for us all, that is what it will boil down too, not the belts, the fans or undisputed. Just money. Best thing is, both fighters have openly lied about it not being about "the money" but now here we are!
     
  13. spravedlivylev

    spravedlivylev Haaaappy Neeeew Yeeeear! banned Full Member

    1,636
    3,300
    Nov 17, 2022
    Usyk ducking, lol.
     
    Gareth Priest likes this.
  14. Leeroy84

    Leeroy84 Lancashire-la-la-la Full Member

    1,081
    1,291
    May 7, 2016
    It is what it is, either he's not confident or he's just about the money. But Krassyuk has given the deadline of 4th April, 50% or they walk.
    Furys offer stands. If Usyk wants it, he should counter offer, not stand firm and make a deadline. What did he want to start with if we've only just now got to 50%? So much for being "easy to deal with".
     
  15. spravedlivylev

    spravedlivylev Haaaappy Neeeew Yeeeear! banned Full Member

    1,636
    3,300
    Nov 17, 2022
    It seems to me that he does while you are the one having trouble understanding it.

    You and other members of the Fury congregation keep parroting about the business side of things. Then why don't you accept that Fury simply isn't worth as much on the market as you or he and his team think? The Saudis don't care about him or some YouTuber moron with a bird's nest for hair. They don't even care about boxing. All they care about is profit. If they don't give Fury $100m it's not because they have an agenda or they want to "disrespect" him (lol at the arrogance of those who think it's about Saudi billionaires and royals being interested in disrespecting some British boxer). They don't give him $100m because they don't think that amount is worth it to invest in him. Simple.

    It's hilarious that whenever you want to justify Fury's demands and career moves, you keep talking about how business and market value work yet the Fury congregation is in full meltdown when the same monetary and business principles are applied by the Saudis when they estimate Fury's market value and how much they can get out of the fight - and apparently, it's not worth $100m for them.

    When Fury didn't accept that the Saudis don't see his market value to be as high as he and his father do, he made a conscious decision to price himself out with the people that could get him the most money in boxing today. It doesn't get any more quack quack than that.

    Fury was like: "Oh yeah, so you business people with business minds whose job is to make the most profit and calculate market values don't agree with me about my market value? Don't you tell me what I'm worth just because it's your job to know what is worth what and that's how you made your millions in the first place, meaning you are obviously good at your job! I won't take your millions then which are actually the highest amount I could get out of a boxing match today! Take that!"

    Ridiculous. Fury has always wanted to duck Usyk, this whole charade is just an act of him trying to save face.
     
    Gareth Priest and Perkin Warbeck like this.