Fury and Wilder status in their own era

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cojimar 1946, Apr 27, 2025.


  1. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,169
    6,214
    Jan 6, 2024
    While everyone shares responsibility, Furys 3 year absence after beating Wladimir Klitschko is the thing that set us down the path. This led to Wilder and AJ treading water waiting for either Fury to return or for him to be gone sufficently long to fight each other to replace him. When you look at how messed up HW is today all roads lead back to that.
     
  2. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,291
    5,181
    Dec 5, 2010
    What the hell is this thread?

    There were the "big three" from 2015-2021. Two of the three fought a trilogy. The other got smacked around by Andy Ruiz.

    This is somehow...a bad thing...for the two guys who engaged in a brutal go out on your shield trilogy?

    What can I say except *JOSHUA FANS*
     
    Redbeard7 likes this.
  3. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,964
    43,008
    Jul 4, 2014
    But you said "post Klitschko era."

    There has been a real problem with shifting the bar on these threads, lately.
     
  4. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,576
    2,231
    Nov 23, 2014
    In terms of resume though Joyce is on par with Wilder in terms of best wins. I'll take a prime Parker, green Dubois and Bryant Jennings over old Ortiz and Stiverne. How is it hard to imagine Joyce beating Wilder when he is likely better than anyone Wilder beat and has a similar resume?

    Otto Wallin nearly took out Fury and he was a journeyman level guy. So I could certainly see him losing to Hrgovic, Kabayel, Dubois etc.

    Id also put Dubois close to Fury in terms of top wins
    Hrgovic vs old Wlad
    Joshua vs Wilder
    Miller vs Chisora
    Lerena vs Whyte
     
  5. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,654
    11,438
    Oct 29, 2012
    You need to re-read. The criticism is neither Fury nor Wilder fought many other top contenders. Both have a **** poor resume. And say what you want about AJ, he took some risks.
     
  6. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,291
    5,181
    Dec 5, 2010
    They WERE the top. And they fought each other. Joshua didn't risk his biscuit against either. He got popped by Fat Andy, looked useless against Usyk, then obliterated by Dubois.

    Fury fought an unbeaten Chisora, champion Klitschko in Germany as an underdog, champion Wilder in America THREE TIMES, twice as underdog, contender Whyte, champion Usyk TWICE as underdog. That's risk. To come out of all that only losing to Usyk is very good indeed.

    Joshua has had a career of meticulously calculated risk and A-side advantage and he still couldn't hold it together.
     
  7. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,654
    11,438
    Oct 29, 2012
    Being at the top doesn't mean you don't fight top contenders. Quite the opposite actually.

    Look, Wilder already admitted to took Fury rather than fight AJ. That's not up for debate. And yes, I know who AJ lost to. Like I said, he took the risks at least win or lose. Just rehashing their resumes doesn't mean a thing, I can look who they fought online if that was important.

    It's a joke to say AJ had a 'meticulously calculated' career, when his resume is stronger then Wilder's and Fury's. Both of theirs are very weak for supposes "top guys of the dsivision", which is what this thread is about.

    Yeah, he fought Wilder three times. Wilder with one of the worst resumes for a titlist. Great time spent on him....
     
    BubblesUK and KO_King like this.
  8. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,576
    2,231
    Nov 23, 2014
    Most people would date the beginning of that era to 2016 or 2017 and don't include 2015 as part of the era.
     
  9. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,576
    2,231
    Nov 23, 2014
    Little evidence they actually were the top though. Fighting Hrgovic, Kabayel, Joshua, Zhang, Joyce etc would have provided a lot more evidence that they were in fact the best.
     
    BubblesUK and The Real Lance like this.
  10. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,291
    5,181
    Dec 5, 2010
    Were you here 2015 to 2020?

    Kabayel in that period? Are you serious? Ortiz was considered far more dangerous than all those guys in that time period and Wilder beat him twice.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  11. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,291
    5,181
    Dec 5, 2010
    Yes, everyone ducked AJ, is that it? This argument makes no sense. Everyone turned down career high money because they wanted to avoid the chinny, average skill guy they saw give up against Andy. Everyone except 40 year old shot guys, that is.

    If you think Joshua didn't have a meticulously calculated career and all the A-side advantage starting with the Olympics, I don't know what to tell you. You are a fanboy and not worth my time.

    In 2018-2020 there were the "big three" of Fury, Wilder, Joshua. Two of those fought each other, one got splattered by Andy. You can spend all day talking about how the guy who didn't fight the others of the big three and LOST to Andy is somehow a...risk taker, but it doesn't add up.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  12. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,576
    2,231
    Nov 23, 2014
    There's no reason to believe Kabayel wouldn't have been a major player then had he been given opportunities to fight top contenders. And the same goes for Zhang and Hrgovic. I doubt he suddenly improved as a fighter in 2023 after 12 years as a pro.

    The only difference is he started being given opportunities only recently.
     
  13. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,654
    11,438
    Oct 29, 2012
    Dude...I rarely have time for this type of reply. But did I say EVERYONE ducked AJ? Or do you just reply in this overly-dramatic fashion all the time?

    EVERY top fighter with a competent promoter gets matched carefully. That's the nature of the game, and nothing that only AJ's group did. But he didn't wait 40 fights to face some of the other top guys.

    Sure play the fanboy card. I don't consider Aj the best anything, never did. I'm a fan of the sport, can you say that, or you prefer just being naysayer?

    Hell, you can't even stick to the topic. Point being, if Wilder and Fury were the top two, they should have faced more top contenders. Go drama queen to someone else....
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2025
    BubblesUK likes this.
  14. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,654
    11,438
    Oct 29, 2012
    Ortiz has done diddly squat. Hell, he lost to Ruiz as well. Ortiz being some monster was never proven in the ring consistently against top guys. Good contender, but that's it.
     
    BubblesUK likes this.
  15. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,964
    43,008
    Jul 4, 2014
    The post Klitschko era began November 28, 2015. Everything thereafter counts.
     
    Jackomano likes this.