FURY BAILING on HIS TITLE FIGHT??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kiwi_in_America, Apr 9, 2017.


  1. JoffJoff

    JoffJoff Regular Junkie Full Member

    1,978
    1,498
    Jan 25, 2017
    You were on my list of "ask who's in his avatar" but I guess I got an answer. Thats all I do on here.
     
    Reg likes this.
  2. pow

    pow Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,954
    4,137
    Apr 26, 2014
    He stepped aside from the Whyte fight to go the WBO route, nothing wrong with that he was looking for a world title not British title penny's. They also had beef with the BBBoC. He didn't turn down AJ, he was offered 200k which is an absolute insult and Eddie wasn't prepared to pay their fee. Fury pulled out of the Ustinov fight due to his uncle dying. He was a last minute replacement for Chisora and he wasn't obliged to take the fight anyway, the Klitscho fights were never on and it was well known in boxing circles that the rematch was never going to happen. We can all see the result of Tyson's battle with depression so no shame or fault to be placed there.

    It seems to me people want to paint the Fury's as dishonorable which stinks of subtle racism to me. What about the times they have been screwed over, the countless opponents who have pulled out on Hughie last minute and the David Haye incidents. Nobody mentions that.
     
  3. SnatchBox

    SnatchBox Boxing Full Member

    5,426
    4,686
    Nov 26, 2016
    Hell yeah brother I used to think I was smart being an atheist.. It really starts to unravel when you realize we've never been to the moon. We don't have technology for man to get past low earth orbit, yet we did it 1969-1972 give me a break. Then NASA loses 14,000 video reels and all the blue prints that took man to the moon. There's endless evidence that we're being lied to and manipulated. The earth has no curvature, except with cgi and fisheye lenses. I used to believe in aliens lol, now I will not be fooled if there ever is an "invasion"

    You ever tried to discuss science with a sleeping person yet?? I love it
     
    heerko koois likes this.
  4. Lith

    Lith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,113
    1,263
    Jul 16, 2010
    Oh my god I hope you are joking.
     
  5. SnatchBox

    SnatchBox Boxing Full Member

    5,426
    4,686
    Nov 26, 2016
    I'm as serious as Nasa's 50 million dollars a day of tax payer's money.

    In your free time do some research it's overwhelming.
    This content is protected
     
  6. Lith

    Lith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,113
    1,263
    Jul 16, 2010
    I won't stay on this beyond this post as it's wildly off topic in this forum - but after watching parts of that video I'm still not convinced you or those videos are being serious (it was FULL of literally funny arguments/"evidence", so I really really hope that most of it is trolling).

    Just in case you are, for what it's worth like most people whose work is involved in the science industry I have done a LOT of research on this topic. Like for years and years, not being indoctrinated like these flat earth/conspiracy theory trolls out there make out - but learning from what's around, some is taught and then you get to a point where you can use equipment, make your own data and analyse it to learn more or back up what you may have been taught previously.

    I work on software which processes radar and satellite data on a daily basis, I see (and have to deal with) the results of Earth curvature ALL THE TIME - ever heard of the term "Fly under the radar"? Part of that is because of earth curvature, radar used in industry operates on big enough scales for Earth curvature to be a significant factor. The curvature in the target zone is significant enough for there to be a "shadow" area where the radar can't see, when you are far enough from the radar you can fly low enough to be behind land even if the landscape is "flat" - ie, out in the ocean.

    Never wondered why radars at airports don't look like they are pointing up? Instead of believing these idiots on youtube do something really simple - go the to flattest clearest place you can at night and watch a plane fly past, if it's a clear enough night you should be able to see it flying for a LONG distance because of the altitude it is at. As it gets further and further away it will get closer and closer to the horizon.

    I'd love to know how one of these authorities on the Earth being flat would explain how the sun can be under the horizon in one place in the world yet up in the sky in another part of the world. There needs to be no conspiracy to make us believe this, I am writing this in broad daylight in the middle of the day in New Zealand and in England it will be late at night. If the powers that be have enough power to make this work, we're all ****ed anyway.

    PS. 3.5 weeks to go!
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2017
    SnatchBox likes this.
  7. NakiFan

    NakiFan Proud Kiwi Guy Full Member

    2,294
    1,018
    Dec 5, 2015
    I also struggle with earth curvature. I can't see the golf ball after I smack a drive due to it dissappearing over the horizon.
     
  8. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,789
    14,707
    Mar 26, 2009
    Real flight data debunks flat earth.

    Not even the idiots on the flat earth forums can explain the flight times across various paths, that can only be proven by the Earth being ROUND.
     
    Lith likes this.