Fury does not really want to fight Wilder again

Again, there wasn’t any intrigue.

From who?

Where are you getting this from?

Tyson systematically broke him down in the rematch.

He beat him easily.

It was an emphatic win.

Wilder then took huge criticism when he said that his costume had affected his legs. It hurt his reputation.

Nobody wanted to see a 3rd fight.

The boxing world wanted Tyson to fight Joshua instead.

Again, there were strong rumours that this last fight was initially delayed due to a lack of ticket sales.

The only reason that we saw a 3rd fight between them was because it was contracted, not because there was a demand for it.

 

The infinite Wilder TKO theorem states that Wilder fighting Fury an infinite number of times will almost surely result in one fight where Wilder TKOs Fury. However, the probability that this will actually happen is so tiny that the chance of it occurring during a period of time hundreds of thousands of orders of magnitude longer than the age of the universe is extremely low (but technically not zero).

 

The worst part of it all was it made it clear he knew he had no good excuses.

If he'd had good reasons (not familiar enough with the new trainer, not quite peaked, camp could've gone better, etc) for why he'd expect to be better next time he'd have said that instead of spewing nonsense about heavy ringwalk costumes and making accusations of cheating.

The cheating accusations are actually worse in this regard, though, as they imply Wilder didn't believe Fury could've beaten him fair and square, so he had to have cheated - that kind of denialism suggests Wilder felt he was fully fit and ready.

 

I think just as importantly, the magnitude of the beatdowns Wilder took in #2 and #3 would suggest he'd be extremely likely to sustain significant damage from trying over and over like that - he might have a 1/10 or 1/20 chance of knocking Fury out, but with every beatdown his odds will get worse.

In that sense, it's not a fixed probability, his odds would be exponentially decreasing, even with Fury's unfortunate habit of fighting down to the level of his opponent.

 

Judging is subjective too

Wilder's draw with Fury was a robbery, just like holyfield v Lewis

 

You could argue Fury-Wilder #1 was a more clear robbery than Holyfield-Valuev... And ain't many you can say that about.

 

Threads/posts like the OP's will continue to be made about Tyson Fury.

And, to quote Thunder Road, that's alright with me.

 

You cannot be serious?!

Fury looked awful in the third fight, nowhere near as fit or sharp as he was in #2 - he didn't need to be as it turned out, but let's not pretend he was in top shape.

I'm not convinced Wilder was out of sorts in #2 either - he was bullied, yes, and lost his equilibrium after the clip, yes (and it can happen to anyone) but if he was injured or not at his best he wouldn't have made such poor excuses or made allegations of cheating.

 

Ironic, given you seem to be regurgitating ldbc bull and taking Fury's word for it that Wilder is the #2 heavy (despite it not being possible for him to know that).

You're just repeating yourself and not engaging with any novel arguments or framing... And then you come out with this sanctimonious horse****? Give me a break!