Fury finally talks...and he's delusional as ever...

This is the reason he lost to Usyk and this will be the reason he will lose again. Poor judgement. He thinks he is winning when he is actually behind.

 

Rummy is the moderator who keeps changing my avatar to Harry und das Henderssen to mock me for my belief in Sasquatch of the Americas. So, I agree, he is a biased American Westerner guy here but I believe he has redemptive characteristics as well. Please, my friend. Please.

 

Hogwash, mate. Fury used it in a disparaging manner. I can't believe I have to explain this. Or more like, I can't believe there are people who try to justify such drivel.

What did Fury say? Listen to him again: "It was probably too easy at times. It was too easy. It was like I was in there with a local amateur boxer, and I was just enjoying it too much and messing around."

Meaning, boxing with Usyk was so easy for him it felt like he was boxing some random amateur from a local boxing gym. His using the word local and amateur had absolutely nothing to do with the elevated ideas you presented here. It seems like you didn't listen to the interview.

 

Who would win between a Sasquatch and Wilder, over 10 rounds? Serious question.

 

You're becoming unhinged and unglued, and I'm not sure I want to go any further down your rabbit hole, but I would point out that Rumsfeld had the same score that I did, and it seems that you are trying to turn the match into something quite different than what it was and how many fans saw it.

You come across as some kind of super fan boy of Usyk. I don't think Rumsfeld has anything against Usyk I've always found Rumsfeld to be a very fair and reasonable scorer.

 

And I would point out that I still don't care about how Rummy scored the fight. I was talking about his liking a post where a fellow forum member tried to justify Fury making a clearly disparaging remark about Usyk's being like a local amateur who was too easy to box with.

 

I think you're taking this a little too seriously my man. Lighten up and learn to have fun.

 

Well...listen, my friend, English is not my first language. It is not even so much my second and I am not thoroughly done with learning it as my third. My family are Etrusco-Germanic. We don't use language the way you might so do. If there is nuance I do not understand from Fury, please, be kind to me. I am trying. If Fury is speaking as I am, he is non-uncomplimentary. If he is speaking as you are saying-I am not sure what you are saying, frankly. Mayhaps you and I may parse this together. Are you speaking of literal or figurative hogwash? You have insulted my family honor, I believe. Where I come from, we take this very seriously. Drivel is an extreme unkindness where I come from and the implications here are severe. It is as if you dug up my ancestors and maked ammonia water on their skeleton faces.

As far as you are concerned, Kostya, I am hesitant about your meaning here. This is a very serious question. But mayhaps not to you but only to me.

 

Good to see more post like this. A lot of people finally start realizing why i don't like this fake acting diva.
And exactly, imagine what person you need to be rooting for such a pos.
He is lying through his teeth every single time he open his mouth. He never address his fans after the loss, and now comes with the silliest excuses and lies once again.
I almost feel sorry for Fury fans, as they pull out the biggest mental gymnastics anyone could comes up in the last 2-3 years as Fury was ducking Usyk relentlessly and Fury fans has to embarrass themselves in order to defend this Fraud.

 

You haven't watched June 1st fights? Sasquatch by brutal KO.

 

Exactly what i was saying for months. Good that people finally realize it. But trying to explain this to a blind, delusional guy like shadow is a waste of precious time, that no one will bring you back. This guy claim Canelo won against Bivol, just tell you everything you need to know about this troll. I got him on ignore since first day on here or so. Sometimes see the ignored post to laugh at him, and then put him on ignore again.

He is delusional and every sane person should have this troll on ignore, and let him argue with his himself, as he is known to have like 5 alts account on here.

 

Says the person who initially scored the match 10-2 in favor of Usyk before finally conceding that Usyk didn't win round 4, Fury actually won it. And despite that concession, you still find yourself in the distinct minority of fans who had it wide for Usyk and are calling me delusional who scored it close and most agreed it was.

And just to be clear, there's nothing wrong with being the minority and having it wider than most saw it, but to call someone delusional for seeing it for the close fight as it was, after already conceding that you initially had it even wider than you now think it was, well that really says it all doesn't it.

 

1 and 2 were clear Usyk Fury landed barely anything in those rounds 3,4,7 and 12 were the close rounds and even if you gave them all to Fury (big IF) still a clear Usyk win. 9-3 is a reasonable score if you gave all close rounds to Usyk but there's no way you can only give Usyk 3 rounds

 

Of course, I never claimed Canelo won against Bivol, so that's just a blatant lie on your end. My argument wasn't that Canelo won, but that 7-5 Bivol wasn't unreasonable, as Canelo arguably won a max of 5 rounds.

So you're clearly being dishonest about what you claim I said in the past, as a means to further discredit my position in regards to this match, which is a curious tactic after already admiting that you overplayed your hand initially in scoring the match a super fanboyish 10-2 in favor of Usyk before finally condeding that no, Usyk didn't win Round 4 as you initially claimed, but that (thanks to my intevention) you corrected yourself and realized Fury won that round.

So lets review, you blatantly lie about what I said about Canelo Bivol in an attempt to exaggerate my position there, then your gloss over your own revised scoring of Usyk Fury, when thanks to my help, I brought you back from Usyk fanboy la la land 1 round closer to earth, whilst claiming I'm delusional about how close it was, despite the average fan score being far closer to my score than yours. You're quite a character but you're trying way too hard. Start being more honest about my positions and yours and you'll be better off.

 

You may have a point that 9-3 Usyk is a more accurate score than 9-3 Fury. But my original point was that there were 3 rounds that each fighter definitely won, which was 4-6 for Fury and 8-10 for Usyk.

Out of the other 6 rounds, it's not unreasonable in my view to score them for Fury. But on the other hand, I would say there's an argument that Usyk won them. They were all close and competitive rounds. You say 1 and 2 were clear Usyk rounds. 1 I gave to Usyk, but I wouldn't call it clear, it was more like he just edged it. Round 2, well 2 of the 3 judges gave it to Fury. What happened in Round 2 was that Usyk started the round good with a crisp one two. And it was a very back and forth round after that but down the stretch of the round Fury started catching Usyk and Usyk didn't have much of an answer to the control Fury established down the stretch of the round.

But as I said, Round 2 I was very conflicted over, I just don't see how you can look at that round and claim it wasn't close, that it was a clear Usyk round. It just wasn't a clear Usyk round by any stretch of the imagination. It was one the hardest rounds to score in the match. And frankly, if you are making the argument that a round in which the vast majority of the boxing public saw as a close round many of whom gave to Fury, was in your view a clear Usyk round, that screams fanboy.