Yes, sure. Like all the times Wlad beat your guy. How does it feel becoming a fan over and over again?
Name a dominant heavy weight champ at forty? didn't think so. Ali at forty lol let's not even go there. Lewis at forty? ye he already retired three years earlier. What about Tyson? on his back snorting crack lol.
Wlad was unbeatable and hardly lost a round in over a decade and now the jealous haters come out when wlad is forty.
It seems to be a trend for young fighters to call out old legends in their prime to beat them for stardom, Everybody wants 40 year old may, Vargas thought he would be a superstar for beating an old declining pac, This is so true, Wlad looked like **** in that fight, Respect to tyson but people are acting like he beat a prime wlad, Wlad looked like a deer caught in a headlight the entire fight.
He wasn't 40 dummy. He was the same age as Mayweather when he schooled Pacquiao. Nobody complained he was shot going into the fight because he still looked the goods. The difference between Wlad and Mayweather is Floyd was an ATG . Wlad isn't. Fury would beat any version of Wlad.
Thats because he made a career out of using his size to bully under matched opponents. He tanks it as soon as he faces somebody his own size who can box n move. He had the same deer in head lights look when he was getting clowned by DaVaryl Williamson 10 years ago. Wlad was no better than John Ruiz.. Take away his holding and he's nothing.
Nobody before the fight was calling Wlad shot and Fury was given no chance of beating him. Wlad finally came up against a guy that was too big and strong for him to jab and grab, and he got easily outboxed. Fury would have beaten any version of Wlad that night. But the thing that irks me most about that fight is the way Wlad lost, refusing to throw a punch, turning his back, launching flying headbutts into Furys face when he got frustrated. He won two rounds max and one of his judges still managed to rob Fury. So glad the HW division is finally rid of this guy.
I washed my hands with after the Mormeck disgrace. No more. So did Sky Sports. Wlad got relegated to defending the HW Championship on Eurosport. He never beat Povetkin as far as im concerned.
See mate that's the problem with you. You never admit you were wrong. You always act like you own the absolute truth. I got Wlad vs. Fury completely wrong. It's part of life, when you are wrong, you admit it, you move on. Rationalizing like it never happened just makes you look like an immature douchebag.
http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/03...f-for-his-constant-clinching-against-mormeck/ Why? Just why? I don't watch boxing to see that nonsense. For you , Wlad could kick and butt a guy to victory and you wouldn't care. As long as he won is all that matters.
No not at all. I hated the Mormeck fight, I hated the Povetkin fight which was awful. I hated the Williamson win which was borderline IMO. Answer this question dino: When were you ever wrong and admitted it? I can't recall it. You always rationalize things so you can talk your way into being right all along.
Fury fought with a perfect plan against Wlad....move around and smother Wlad's jab. Worked perfectly. Wlad is such a robot, used to fighting smaller men, that he couldn't change his attack (such as it was), couldn't change the way he fights that usually wins. And apparently Wlad didn't listen to anyone in his corner if, in fact, he was getting any advice at all. I predicted a Wlad win before the fight; I think Fury is a buffoon and he'd proved himself to be one at each and every opportunity to do so. But it was a no contest from the get go.