Fury is a true boxer, Joshua and Wilder are just good athletes with mediocre skills.

Well, that's where the skills part comes into play.

 

I personally think you cant succeed in any sport without being athletic. If Fury wasnt athletic he’d be just a fat anti semetic plodder.

 

I'm not sure what point you're making, though. As with anything, there are degrees. Wilder is more athletic than Fury, no? Just as Fury is more skilled than Wilder, yes?

So the question at hand is whether Fury's skill or Wilder's athleticism will prove for each man the greater foible to his adversary, would you agree?

 

I agree with the levels of athleticism, but anyone could look athletic if they had Wilders abysmal competition

 

People changing history to make it seem like Fury has fought a lineup of top worthy opposition... By the same standard of the thread title, Fury's just a big tall "bloke" with mediocre skills, maybe even sub-par skills (certainly so for someone on the short list of "lineal HW champions").

 

Anyone could look skilled if they had Furys (minus one fight with 40 year old Wladimir where Fury was the bigger man who got off first... and still averaged what, two more punches per round?)