Fury is going to decimate Usyk

Ngannou also didn't fall for most of the dumb **** that Wilder does. Yes, Ngannou is still pretty basic but he was smart enough not to walk into Fury's shots like Wilder did. Much better Ring IQ.

 

Fury is the most overrated boxer of all time never have I seen a boxer with such a weak resume greatly overestimated.

His fanboys and even himself always make him win on the internet but come that match day we see a pathetic performance and a very close match a novice embarrassed him for crying out loud and still there is excuses.

Now once again you greatly overestimate him nobody knows Fury abilities because he always duck top 10 opponents, I think it foolish to underestimate Usyk using his size that doesn't mean nothing. Usyk is not a flat footed fighter like Chisora and Whyte. He constantly moves, his hand speed, boxing output and foot movement is greater than Fury if anyone thinks this will be an easy fight for Fury where he just lean on him like Wilder who barely moves you in for a huge shock.

 

"Fury is the most overrated boxer of all time never have I seen a boxer with such a weak resume greatly overestimated."

Victories over Klitschko and Wilder (x2) supersedes the quality of any other resume a current heavyweight has. Also, the way he handily disposed of Whyte and Chisora are top notch. He's also undefeated.

 

Impressive post. Three sentences and all of them are dead wrong factually.

 

You mean Whyte, who was just KOed 1 fight ago brutally by shot to s**** Povetkin. That Whyte, right? Or Chisora, who spend more time on the floor than on his feet against already faded Parker. Same Chisora that should have lost to 40 year old Pulev, but get a SD in UK.
Chisora is beyond shot to s**** and never was good to begin with.

Klitschko was 39,6 and Fury barely outpoint him, as he landed 1-2 more patty jabs per round. Wilder resume is dog**** and there is a reason for that.
So no Fury resume is nowhere near good, forget being the best.

You also forget to mention Fury ducked Klitschko rematch, and was banned for PED, as he was doping like mad at that time. And this win and the one over Hammer should have been NC 100%.

 

Factually?

Officially he's undefeated, anything else is one's opinion.

The victory over Klitschko, albeit not exciting, was extremely impressive. He nullified everything Klitschko did, the dominant champion who ruled over the division for years up until that point barely won 3 rounds against Fury.

No other boxer has done that to Wilder. No other boxer has made Whyte and Chisora look so bad.

How do you dispute any of this?

 

So you have to add that he is officially undefeated. We both know what that means - he lost multiple times but was gifted decisions.

He was juiced up against Klitschko, it’s ridiculous that he gets any praise for that fight. Also, he duly ducked the rematch where he would have faced Klitschko without PEDs. How surprising he didn’t fancy that scenario. Also also, Joshua beat a far better and aggressive version of Klitschko shortly after in a much more decisive fashion.

Wilder is a walking punching bag for any decently skilled fighter. What’s impressive in beating a very limited therefore always protected guy whose best win is an ancient Ortiz and apart from that he literally has nobody on his resume?

Chisora and Whyte, lol. Joshua beat both of them when they were much fresher and much more dangerous. Whyte was still unbeaten also.

The best HW resume belongs to a guy who has more kids than title fights? What a joke. Joshua’s resume is the best of any active HWs. Anyone says otherwise is either pushing an agenda or knows nothing about boxing.

 

“So you have to add that he is officially undefeated. We both know what that means - he lost multiple times but was gifted decisions.”

You said factually, I wasn’t sure what you were referring to.

“He was juiced up against Klitschko, it’s ridiculous that he gets any praise for that fight. Also, he duly ducked the rematch where he would have faced Klitschko without PEDs. How surprising he didn’t fancy that scenario. Also also, Joshua beat a far better and aggressive version of Klitschko shortly after in a much more decisive fashion.”

Has that been officially proven? Officially, as in factually? I’m not talking pie in the sky, here say, opinions and horse****. Was this proven officially that Fury was on PED’s at the time of the Klitshcko fight?

Regarding the Joshua victory over Klitschko, exciting as ****, went tooth and nail, ebb and flow, the fight literally made Joshua a household name in the UK. It's not as impressive as Fury’s victory, Klitshcko barely won 3 rounds in my opinion.

“Wilder is a walking punching bag for any decently skilled fighter. What’s impressive in beating a very limited therefore always protected guy whose best win is an ancient Ortiz and apart from that he literally has nobody on his resume?”

He dispatched Breazeale in one round, it took Joshua how many? He dispatched Helenius in one round, it took Joshua how many? He dispatched Ortiz twice by KO, Ruiz couldn’t get Ortiz out of there. He dispatched Arreola inside 9 rounds, Ruiz went to a hard fought decision with Arreola. Wilder is simply an avoided fighter, that's the reason his resume is a tad thin in my opinion.

“Chisora and Whyte, lol. Joshua beat both of them when they were much fresher and much more dangerous. Whyte was still unbeaten also.”

Ok sweetheart, are you taking the **** here? When did Joshua fight Chisora?

Who’s got the best resume at heavyweight then?

 

I can only assume this is a tongue in cheek post.

 

Hard to do anything to Wilder when he won't fight anyone.

 

Joshau gets alot of crap but his resume is far better than Fury I don't know how one can deny the obvious. Joshau had more title defenses and fought more top 10s what are you on about?

Joshau also beat Klitchko btw you making no point. You cant be serious about Chisora and Whyte they bums and gate keepers they slow plodders how can you brag about Fury beating them?

Deontay Wilder is a horrible boxer with minimal fundamentals what he has is power and snap many guys can outbox him and his resume just like Fury is weak.

 

"You said factually, I wasn’t sure what you were referring to." To the fact that John Fury said to McDermott after the first fight "congratulation, you won"? To the fact that a gash needing 47 stitches is a textbook TKO anywhere in the world but Fury was only allowed to continue because the fight was in the US only weeks after he signed a 100 million USD deal with ESPN?

"Has that been officially proven? Officially, as in factually?" - Fury served a ban for PED usage. How more official could it be than that? Also, how do you figure, while Fury used PEDs against a nobody like Hammer but was clean straight after for the biggest and toughest fight of his life and what was his only chance at a world title at that point? Are you for real? Fury already tested positive in 2015, before the Klitschko fight, but the results were only revealed in June 2016. Why do you think that is? If you think it's a serious question: boxing is not for you, you don't understand how it works in a business sense and how its corruption affects matters.

"went tooth and nail, ebb and flow" - hence why I said it was a more aggressive and dangerous Klitschko, not a gun shy tentative one that faced Fury. You just proved my point. Also, Joshua scored that decisive win without PEDs.

"He dispatched Breazeale in one round, it took Joshua how many? He dispatched Helenius in one round, it took Joshua how many?" Do you even know boxing with arguments like that? That's not how it works. Styles make fights. Is that the first time you hear that? Povetkin got rid of Whyte in 5 rouns. Fury needed 6, and it was an already heavily declined, lower punch resistance version of Whyte exactly because of the brutal KO from Povetkin. So you just proved with your silly argument how Povetkin was way better than Fury. Congratulations.

"Ok sweetheart, are you taking the **** here?" - I was, well done for spotting. You didn't go to school for nothing, good for you Also, I'm happily married to a wonderful woman, mate, so while your throwing pet names at me is flattering, I don't play for the other team. But cheer up, there must be a nice bloke out there for you somewhere.

"Who’s got the best resume at heavyweight then?" - The answer is still Joshua. You can ask it ten more times, and the answer will still be Joshua ten more times.

(As a side note lol at @Rumsfeld agreeing with your previous post. Hilarious how badly he hides that he is a devoted Fury fan. Always with the low key agreeing with the pro-Fury statements but never prepared to admit his pro-Fury stance openly in a post most probably because it would hurt his YT activities where it's best to present yourself as an objective boxing analyst if you want the number of your subscribers and video views to grow.)

 

Not at all.

 

Apparently, it wasn't. But my mate @humbug just argued that the most important thing in boxing is to look at how long it takes for a fighter to knock their opponents out. Haye knocked a never-knocked-out-before 28-year-old Chisora erlier than Fury ever could. That means Haye was miles better than Fury. Also, Povetkin was miles better than Fury because he knocked a fresher, less battle worn version of Whyte out earlier than Fury could.

The more you know.

 

You're carrying on like an irrational, illogical woman, sweetheart.

A 100 million USD deal after fighting McDermott? How much fuel from siphoning cars have you been drinking?