Fury PED Controversies

Which was before the Wlad fight. How long Fury was on Juice until he got caught is the question. The suspension came after the Wlad fight.

The guys a drug cheat and a bigot.

 

Doesnt exist 1 boxer in pro that is not MORE or LESS juiced.

 

PED's can do a lot for a fighter. It burns fat, increases muscle energy and recovery, and also adds power. Here's the thing, sports are not about who has the best chem lab and drugs. The playing field has to be level.

A loss doesn't make a fighter a bum. A fraud however who won a belt over an old man is a different story.

 

luckily it is easy to see Fury have a better boxingIQ than Klitschko and Wilder. And I dont think the most delusional hater believes Fury was allowed to have an advantage in Germany and the USA.

But then again haters gonna hate....

 

Come on the wbc is even trolling the drug cheat tin foil hats on twitter.

he may have been in excess or near the threshold of nandrolone after the hammer fight, which can be proven to occur naturally at even higher levels which hard cardio and large men.

cocaine for sure. Nandrolone possibly.

why was David Haye tested 4 times in the wlad fight. Two weeks. One. Day before. Day after. Wlad only the day after.

same with pulev.

wlad was wanting an investigation after losing to Brewster. Do you not think he’d be wanting one after fury if there was foul play?

 

I've always thought it was incredible that UKAD waited 16 months before charging Tyson Fury for the nandrolone and it seemed highly suspect that they did so at the 'height of' his unpopularity.
Tyson and Peter Fury always claimed they had been informed of 'elevated levels' by UKAD at the time and had been advised to adjust their diet and were originally told there was no case to answer.
And UKAD never denied this. UKAD later admitted 'delay in test results management'.

In other words, it looks to me as if UKAD let Fury off originally, and gave them a friendly 'heads up' warning that they need to 'adjust' because the nandrolone was showing up.
Then, 16 months later, when Fury had proven to be no particular asset to British sport as heavyweight champion (in 2016 when he was a pariah after the Klitschko win), UKAD pulled the case out from their drawer and attempted to smack him with it.
That's what it looked like.

 

fury was hated by the public at the time. Even now the tabloids are coming out with nonsense 5 YEARS later to discredit his win.

they have an agenda and I don’t know why

 

happy there are people out there that can see through the nonsense of the tabloids

 

Yeah, there's definitely people out there that will do anything to have him out of boxing and his reputation completely ruined.

I mean, at the very worst we can say he took nandrolone back in 2015. Let's, for argument's sake, give him no leeway there and say he took it.
And that was already settled. It looked 'poilitical' back then but maybe he took the nandrolone as well. Whatever. It's history. It was settled. It's done.

But NOW someone is out there working to get him done again for the same offence. So the really underlines the agenda against him.

 

mate absolutely bizarrel. Why would a farmer wait 5 years?

even the WBC is laughing at it on twitter. The media want AJ as the face.

 

Klitschko was 40 and was pretty much washed up, Prime for Prime i don't rate Fury's chances that high watch how Wlad went after taller boxers in his prime.

 

Precisely.

 

solid take:

This content is protected

 

Nandrolone has a half life of 12 days, meaning that it can still be in your system well over a month after your doseage. And there would probably be multiple dosages

would be a stupid steroid for a modern boxer to take with the advanced testing

 

Wlad, in his prime, never fought a tall fighter with Furys skillset. I guess we will never know who would beat who prime for prime, but my money would be on Fury no doubt