Fury stoppage

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Jimmy2guns, Nov 12, 2011.


  1. Jimmy2guns

    Jimmy2guns Member Full Member

    128
    0
    Oct 11, 2011
    Quite a few people around the world will see this and it's making British boxing look bad it's a joke that guy still had something go give. Credit to Tyson he wanted it to keep going. Also he needs to sort his weight out he barely through in the first and is a sucker for the overhand right imagine wlads stiff right it would kill him
     
  2. Del Boy

    Del Boy R.I.P Darren Sutherland Full Member

    2,860
    109
    Nov 13, 2009
    Ya credit to both men they wanted to fight on but I think Pajvic was almost out on his feet and could hardly defend himself as well as being down twice that round already, a few more clean shots and he would have been out, it was for his own safety.

    American fas these days seem to care a lot more about highlight reel KOs then they do about fighters health
     
  3. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    It wasn't THAT bad a stoppage. The thing is people just wanna see someone layed out cold. The fella was done. You could see his legs doing a Paul Smith afterwards.
     
  4. snedsy76

    snedsy76 Member Full Member

    182
    0
    Sep 11, 2011
    Didn't think it was a bad stoppage the 1st time, watched it back and now think the referee was spot on!

    Good shout Phil Edwards :good
     
  5. daveyboy1609

    daveyboy1609 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,901
    634
    Apr 6, 2009
    Boxrec have this up time: 2:43 | referee: Phil Edwards
    Commonwealth (British Empire) heavyweight title
    Fury benefited from a questionable stoppage.


    I really have seen worse! Didn't think it was so bad- if he'd stopped it after the second knockdown im not so sure people would have their knickers in a twist. He could have let it run a little longer but think Fury had him.
     
  6. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Decent stoppage....supposed fight fans who are only happy when a man is layed out unconcious make me puke
     
  7. daveyboy1609

    daveyboy1609 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,901
    634
    Apr 6, 2009
    Firtha fight was a worse stoppage. Kell Brook vs Jackiewicz was worse.
     
  8. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,948
    0
    May 10, 2011
    Just because there are worse stoppages doesn't make it ok!!! If it had been Fury in Pajkic position would the fight have been stopped? Not a chance! BS stoppage is what you expect from British refs now though
     
  9. dave-slave

    dave-slave Guest

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm1iRJMGtJg[/ame]


    not the best quality..
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Pajjic had been allowed to continue after 2 knockdowns, that was enough.
     
  11. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    I thought that as well mate but someone came on here and said his mate was sat near Jackiewics corner and the ref went over and told them he was going to stop it unless Jackiewics started throwing some punches in the next round.

    The guy just wasn't doing anything offensively, was getting hit and then got a warning that he needed to get himself into the fight or or was going to be stopped. Fair enough, I thought.
     
  12. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Watched too many Rocky films as kids?;)
     
  13. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    Its all dem head shots :deal
     
  14. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,948
    0
    May 10, 2011
    They werent bad knockdowns though and Pajkic was still throwing back
     
  15. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    So was Fury after his. Fury was allowed to continue after 1 knockdown, Pajkic was allowed to continue after 2 knockdowns. I don't really see the controversy other than people wanting to see a clean KO.

    I mean, what odds would you want on Pajkic after that second knockdown in order for you put a decent bet on? 10-1? 20-1?