Fury was never that good.

Let's just take it easy. He lost twice against a boxer who's all about the living the life of a boxer. Nothing but complete dedication to the sport.

Fury is the total opposite. He did very well but he could've and should've done so much better.

I'm ready to support the next generation of British talent. Unlike some of you wankers here, rooting against the Brit.

Disgusting.

 

He did and he was a massive twat for doing so. Then he changed his allegiance to the Union Jack, the one and true flag.

 

Never go full .......

 

It's a little over nine years since Fury traveled to Dusseldorf and comprehensively outboxed Klitschko, who had dominated the division for the previous decade.

Then, after going on the **** for three years and going to hell and back, wasting his peak boxing years, he comes back, and within six months, signs to fight Wilder, giving another champion a boxing lesson on his own turf.

Then, he knocks him out in the rematch in a career-best performance, again away from home.

After that it can be argued he took the easy route, but up until that point he was the best heavyweight on the planet, and his comeback is up there with the best in any sport.

 

So, does that mean Usyk is no good?

 

Fury has always been massively overrated, his record is shocking and he’s consistently done his best to avoid taking on contenders.

He backed himself into a corner with Usyk and it was clear he didn’t originally want to fight him.

 

wilder is crap. Look at what other actual contenders have done to him since he finally stepped up.

 

Fury does have a problem with his record. When the hype and marketing die down people will look at who he actually fought during time as champion, and it won’t be in his favour, especially with Wilder’s reputation ageing like milk.

 

Ironically, I don't recall many people calling Wilder crap in 2018 when the fight against Fury was officially announced after the Pianeta fight; if I remember correctly, the general consensus was Tyson was going to get sparked out inside a couple rounds.

Just maybe the trilogy, inactivity, and age took something out of both fighters.

 

I think Fury's win over Wlad and Wilder keep him more than OK in any unbias conversation, he clearly wrecked Wilder and tbh Fury isn't the same man now.

What you have to look at is opinions before the fights happened, if you backed him to handily spank Wlad and Wilder fair play

 

Those in the know always called Windmill Wilder crap.

 

Yup.

https://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story...-wilder-vs-tyson-fury-wilder-fury-predictions

 

This content is protected

 

Fury is obviously very good and at his very best he probably would go down as a HW ATG.

But he does have some shockers on his resume. Ngannou, McDermott, Wallin. I won’t add Wilder to the list because he was still nowhere near a good level of fitness at the first fight.

He’s been floored by some really average fighters like Ngannou and Pajkic. Cunningham was above average but a very small HW and Fury had to use rough-house tactics to win with a foul in the lead up to the KO.

And don’t forget the Ustinov duck - that was really cowardly tbh.

He’s a legend but a really weird boxer in that at his worst he looked genuinely **** poor in the ring but at his best he looked untouchable at times.