Furys 3rd win over Chisora is underrated

Nothing really it's a solid win for Usyk in his first real test at Heavyweight nothing more nothing less.

 

Fury is an ATG with gifts which will not be replicated probably ever again, only falling short really to his own discipline failures and another equally great ATG in Usyk who had tough close fights with Fury.

 

No fact

 

We need a fourth because 3 wasn't enough.

 

What are you implying ? Are you actually serious ?

So you think a Cruiserweight moving up to Heavyweight in his first real test.

Is equivalent to world Heavyweight champion facing the same opponent 3 times who was not ranked in the top 10 and who he already beat twice before convincingly ?

There's nothing "convenient" about it its called context.

Usyk was a contender still testing the waters at Heavyweight.

The other was a world Heavyweight champion facing an unranked opponent for the 3rd time.

Yes there is a difference to anyone with any common sense.

 

sure it is and I am sure you wouldn’t mind to see Fury fight Chisora once again.

 

No, it isn't.

 

Why stop at 4? Robinson fought LaMotta what? 5 times? Greb fought Tunney 5 times. Langford fought Jeannette 7 or 8 times.

I'm sure Al Turki would give them both a 3 right contract.

 

I like the way you think old man

 

I can think very well. My brain works just fine. Now if I can get my back to work I'll be as happy as a pig in shite.

 

To me it was hilarious seeing Fury easily **** 2 of Eddie’s main stay guys back to back in Whyte and Chisora.

 

Both are garbage wins. Chisora was still a bum, who he had easily beaten twice. Whyte had just been literally knocked unconscious by a shot 41 year old Povetkin. Couldn't find two lamer wins without visiting Wilders boxrec page.

 

Chisoras best win is against a 41 year old Pulev and he needed hometown cooking to get a md. No way he beats Frazier even if they dig him up now.

 

Usyk also didn't want to look too good, or Fury would have ducked him .