Futch-Arcel, who was the greater trainer?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JAB5239, Jun 5, 2011.


  1. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Both Ray Arcel and Eddie Futch trained some of the greatest champions in history. In your opinion, who was the greater trainer and why? Do you base your opinion solely on the names they trained or do you look at who they developed a fighter and the game plans they brought into the biggest fights. Vote and discuss.
     
  2. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    286
    Apr 18, 2007
    Futch was the architect of Norton's win over Ali. Holmes has said Eddie really knew his stuff, and of course both he and Arcel worked for Larry at the same time. I tend to go with Futch, who remained active in the sport while Ray took a hiatus of a couple decades before coming back with Peppermint Frazer against Locche. Therefore, although Arcel goes back earlier in the sport's history, it could be argued that Eddie ultimately accrued the greater experience. Listening to the two of them talk, I got the sense that Futch knew more.
     
  3. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    I just posted this as my deciding factor in this same thread at bscene history section. It seems, and I may be wrong, that Futch was the better strategist with the lesser talent.
     
  4. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    286
    Apr 18, 2007
    I think he was, although Arcel's plan for dethroning Locche with Frazer was clever enough. Eddie would have been an articulate and informative broadcast analyst, but it was Dundee and Clancy who indulged in television commentary.
     
  5. quarry

    quarry Guest

    Futch was taught his trade by Arcel
     
  6. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    So what. Does that mean the student can never surpass the teacher?
     
  7. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    93
    Oct 29, 2010
    :deal
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,561
    Nov 24, 2005
    I don't know if we can say one was better than the other.
    How are you measuring it ?

    I always think of Ray Arcel as the epitome of a boxing trainer, but there were other great masters before him and after him.
    He was an expert at conditioning a fighter, and worked with so many champions and contenders it would be almost impossible to name them all.

    Futch - and others - may well be his "equal" though, but I don't know how that's measured.
     
  9. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Im not really measuring it, just looking for opinions. Im not against Arcel at all and have no problem with anyone puting him over Futch. Myself, I lean towards Futch based on the the game plan he set up for Norton to beat arguably the greatest heavyweight ever. But thats just MY opinion. :good
     
  10. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    ray arcel is my GOATT. the fighters themselves prove enough.
     
  11. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,655
    2,134
    Aug 26, 2004
    Both were great, Ray Arcel was brilliant and so was Futch....Ray was old school taught and so was Futch...Ray went back further and brought that perspective but Eddie also had depth