How many of you guys have heard about this yet? Joe Cortez was a guest on Leave it in the Ring Radio's: The Boxing Voice this past Sunday, explaining his improved system of scoring he has been studying on his own time. Apparently Ring Mag thinks so highly of the idea, they're doing a 4 page piece on it in their next issue. I'm gonna post the link to the interview, Joe is the final guest after Pedro Diaz and Tony Weeks so if you want to skip right to it, he's around the 95 minute mark of the show. Here's the link to the podcast & the story http://t.co/Cg0Lzcsl And here is the story posted on the The Voices site today Basically he believes a higher vantage point for the judges will lead to much more accurate judges decisions. He wants to perch 3 judges around the ring, similar to the way judges in Tennis and Volleyball are perched. He says in his own studies where he had 3 judges perched, and 3 judges in their normal places, the elevated judges missed a considerable amount less of landed punches then the normal seated judges. What do you guys think about this idea?
Frankly, that sounds like a great idea, and I feel dumb for not thinking of it first. I still do think there are a lot of incompetent judges, but simply getting them a better angle should improve things. I mean, why should TV viewers have a better angle than the judges who actually need to score the fight? At first, based on the title, I thought this proposal was just going to be a variation of Argentina's half-point system.
I know right it's such a simple yet smart idea it's hard to believe nobody has come up with it yet. I really hope it catches on, it could make a world of difference in cutting down on the amount of controversial decisions.
I can't think of a good reason not to do that. The only negatives would be: - it's not traditional (I don't care for that, judging is one of the main aspects boxing needs to improve, so forget tradition!). - it might obscure some fans views when watching live (I'm sure they can figure out seating and placement to mitigate that). Forgetting any controversial fights he was involved in, I think he's onto something here. Whilst I don't think the study was exactly thorough enough to warrant admission to a scientific journal, I think the idea just happens to be one that's a blindingly obvious improvement that can't fail to help the judges see better.
great idea. The hardest part would be implementing it. I found that boxing is a sport living in the stone age. It's very resistant and slow to change.
I know. The idea is so amazing in it's simplicity, that it is truly unbelievable no one in the history of the game has ever come up with it yet. The concept was right there under everyone's noises this whole time with Volleyball and Tennis to name the most prominent sports showing the way this whole time. Hopefully the Nevada or California athletic commissions give this idea a chance. I really think this concept could go a long way in fixing a big problem that has been plaguing boxing since forever.
Agreed. I was expecting something lofty considering it's called a 20/20 system. I don't get why, just to make it sound more fancy I guess. It seems like a great idea.
Should've made a dry run with some commissions on lower-level promotions. More of a case-study per se. They should try it with three actual judges who were sanctioned to score the fight and three on the elevated flatform. Then compare the scores after the fight. And probably after a year of evaluation, study the comparison and decide whether or not to completely apply it as the actual scores. Sound like a plan though. One problem, I'm not that keen on heights.
I hear ya but nope, what he's proposing is as simple as posting the appointed judges in elevated seats 8 feet above. So they would be able to get a birds eye view so to speak. It really is hard to fathom this idea hasn't been thought of before, there really isn't much to it, yet I believe it would make a world of difference.