G-man, Golovkin seems to easy to hit and hasnt been tested enough to say how good he is. Dont matter how good your chin is, if your getting hit like that all night long by a puncher like that your going to feel the pace eventually
The same G man who lost to dennis milton and ralf ward and got KO'd by Nigel Benn? Golovkin is untested against a calibre of fighter such as mcclellan, but lets stop this revisionist nonesense
What we need to stop is the overrating of Golovkin the dude knocks out some polish bum and now all of a sudden hes some kind of boxing god who cant possibly be beat. Yes McClellan lost some fights so did Sugar Ray Robinson does that mean we should pick Golovkin over Robinson too?
I did say Golovkin is unproven against a guy like McClellan. I was pointing out the fact that McClellan seems to assume a god like status and was unbeatable. He was not. He lost to 2 journeymen and then got KO'd by Benn, the same Benn who by this stage had stoppage losses to Eubank and Watson, both of whom arent considered anywhere near the puncher that McClellan was regarded as. As for the last part of your post, come on dude, lets have a sensible debate.