Gale Van Hoy addresses allegation's made by Malignaggi.

I do have to disagree a little bit here. The judging criteria is "clean, effective punching". This is where a weak jab could be considered ineffective possibly by a judge.

 

he should be banned even from watching boxing on TV

 

Its hard to suspend a judge in those cases ... but he should be banned from doing fights ... thats the reason why some fighters don't like to travel outside of big markets ... thats way they don't go over seas ...

 

deal:deal

 

Clean doesn't mean it has to have power as long as it connects.

Effective in a way that it messed up the opponents face even if it doesn't KO the opponent.

Watch Pallie's jab as they connect.

That's exactly why his scores are too far from what really happened in the fight. :deal

And if he does that again . . . in some other fights . . . he maybe attacked and get killed by an angry MOB.

 

A little over dramatic, dont you think?

I guess I will never see the fight the way you all did, those who scored it for Paulie, I did not see what you all were talking about. I saw no dominating done by Paulie.

 

That's actually a pretty damn good point. **** it, let's roll with incompetance and **** can that mother****er anywayz.

 

i had the same in mind that at times even when they were landing it seemed like they weren't

 

To many of you Paulie fans are blinded by what you think where effective jabs. The **** missed about 600 jabs. That isn't clean effective punching that is **** boxing.

Someone compared Malignaggi to Whitaker?? PUT THE BONG DOWN!!!
According to CompuBox Whitaker LANDED more then 400 punches 3 different times in championship fights. Paulie couldn't land that many against a punching bag.

 

I think that being BIASED in a professional boxing match equates to being corrupt, sorry. Having a pre-concieved notion before a match is exactly why a judge should not be doing that job.

Think of it in terms of a criminal trial, so the judge goes into the trial thinking, "well, this ******* is definetely guilty"... see my point?

 

My friend that is human nature. I bet that 99 percent of the time a judge is already leaning one way or another from reading the briefs. Yes they are "impartial" but they are human and to believe otherwise is naive.

 

apparently ring generalship doesn't count for anything to him.

 

Guerrero in his last two rounds displayed ring generalship. He kept distance, by putting out a stinging jab and throwing combos off of it that kept Klassen at bay.

Paulie ran away throwing ineffective jabs, that isn't ring generalship in my book.

 

:happy:happy:happy:happy

 

i agree to some extent, jabs need to be effective to be counted as a score. If it touches the opponents face and does nothing, i wouldnt count it, if it is just used to make you look like your throwing punches i wouldnt count it too, but if it somehow backs the opponent, or snaps his head back, then there's a score. In this case, it was effective, and that thing about just hitting the gloves? how come Juans face didnt look like so fresh?