Gary Allen Russell, Jr. vs. Francisco Martínez Sánchez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 13, 2019.


"Mr." or "Kiko, La Sensación"?

Poll closed May 18, 2019.
  1. Russell on points

    36.4%
  2. Russell by stoppage

    63.6%
  3. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Martínez on points

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Martínez by stoppage

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Co-feature to Wilder vs. Breazeale on Saturday @ Barclays, airing live on Showtime. WBC featherweight title at stake, 4th defense of Russell. Martínez is ranked #3 by the WBC.

    My question is...why, doe? I'm not even being sarcastic. That "why" has twofold meaning: why is GRJ cherry-picking such a mismatch for his fourth title defense (I understand he's coming off a legit challenger in Jo-Jo Díaz, but that was on the heels of the so-so Escandón and garbage Hyland...) and why the heck is Kiko still rated that highly? I love the ornery, boiled-leather Spaniard but this is a "what have you done for me lately" sport, and the only thing Martínez has done of late is draw with inexperienced countryman Marc Vidal in a failed attempt to wrest away his EBU title, and then outpoint him in the rematch to win it. Before that, he was on a 3-2-1 run with all three victories (and the draw) against tomato cans, getting outclassed & destroyed by LSC and coming up short (officially, albeit somewhat controversially) against British feather-fist Josh Warrington.

    Like, dude, you held Vasyl Lomachenko to a MD in your only pro defeat. You can do better than you've been (outside Jo-Jo) in terms of competition, especially for a world championship reign. Carl Frampton's sloppy-seconds, really? :shakehead:

    I fail to see a realistic path to victory for Kiko unless the slick and hyper-quick American southpaw injures himself. :nusenuse:
     
  2. Chuck Norris

    Chuck Norris Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,012
    37,168
    Aug 31, 2016
    I'm also a fan of the Spaniard, but sadly he is gonna take a beating on Saturday.
     
    IntentionalButt likes this.
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    I honestly consider this more pointless matchmaking than even the main event. Russell's chin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilder's, p4p - and while Martínez is a bigger puncher than Breazeale p4p, I wouldn't say by quite as many >'s.
     
    Chuck Norris likes this.
  4. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,611
    29,173
    Oct 12, 2010
    It's another pointless match up for Gary Russell Jr. He's literally wasting away his prime years. He should be fighting Leo Santa Cruz or Oscar Valdez. What a shame.
     
  5. wifly

    wifly Active Member Full Member

    867
    1,154
    Jan 31, 2017
    That MD loss Russell got vs Lomachenko was bull****, how the **** can anyone score that a fight a draw, Russell was competitive 3 or 4 rounds as much, there wasn't a clear round you can give to Russell. On the other hand I think Kiko is shot to pieces, I watched live his fight vs Eusebio Osejo 3 years or so ago, but IMO he beat Warrington that fight was a robbery and Josh has demostrated he is world class by beating Selby and Frampton, so you never know.
    Russell by KO in mid rounds is my prediction
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    I had it very wide for Loma but many of those rounds were close and it stands as his third hardest night in the pros (after Siri, of course, and Linares). Russell was more competitive than Pedraza.
     
    Rock0052 and wifly like this.
  7. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,126
    240,498
    Nov 23, 2013
    If this match could talk....
    This content is protected
     
    Holler and Rock0052 like this.
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    :lol:

    Thing is, Kiko is tough enough that he'll last at least 6-7 rounds even if GRJ is landing at like 90% (which he will be), meaning this won't be over with merciful quickness, but instead will just prolong things so we have to wait until midnight EST, all for a stupid, long overdue Wilder grudge match that probably won't even see him get exposed, since Breezy isn't that good.
     
    CST80 likes this.
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Odds:

    Russell 1/25
    Martínez 11/1
    Draw 33/1
    Over 9.5 rounds 6/5
    Under 9.5 rounds 8/13
     
  10. The Ogdoad

    The Ogdoad Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,121
    1,187
    Feb 27, 2017
    This matchup is trash. It gets to a point where the fighter has to speak up. Leo Santa Cruz better be next up or something.
     
    IntentionalButt likes this.
  11. Txomo

    Txomo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,194
    130
    Jul 19, 2012
    Russell should win this one by a wide margin but... that's boxing and you never could count someone out. I'd be really happy if Kiko pulls a "Castillejo-Sturn I" on GRJ lazy ass. :-D
     
  12. Liquorice

    Liquorice Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,515
    7,683
    May 13, 2018
    **** me there are more Russell's then Baldwin brother's
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006

    ...or Wayans siblings... (gotta show love for the sistahs in this post-feminism world!! :nono:)
     
  14. Paranoid Android

    Paranoid Android Manny Pacquiao — The Thurmanator banned Full Member

    7,393
    5,900
    Jul 21, 2017
    Officially, an MD. In reality, Lomachenko won 10-11 rounds.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    I had it that wide, personally, but many of those rounds were close, I can see having a narrower card. Now, can I see a draw? No, but...