gatti vs kid chocolate featherweights...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Apr 18, 2011.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
  2. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    Aside from the fact that there was a lot of talk about his outside-the-ring activities, I think Chocolate was thrown in with too many high quality fighters too quickly into his career. Throwing him with a much bigger, more accomplished veteran like Kid Berg so soon into his career was absolutely nuts IMO, and a lot of reports at the time thought the body beating Berg gave him must've taken something out of him. And yet Chocolate was right back fighting LaBarba and Battalino in short order after that, and then Canzoneri up at 135 not long after that.
     
  3. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    That was the way it was in those times, as the careers of Canzoneri, LaBarba and Battalino also tell. Chocolate I think would be known as one of the greatest ever had he fought in the "modern" ring. Longer layoffs, stricter officiating and better match-making would have done him well, considering his vast skillset. It was factors other than that which let him down. He could hang in there today and not look dated one bit.
     
  4. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    100
    Aug 21, 2008
    Even in his own time though, Chocolate's matchmaking was considered extreme. For example, a Ring magazine article from the early '30s (printed shortly after Chocolate's losses to LaBarba and Battalino) cited Chocolate as a prime example of a fighter who was matched too tough too soon, and appeared to burn out as a result.