Geale V Osumanu Adama 29/2/12

Based on what? WTF are you talking about?

How is Adama better than Sylvester, or the 2010 version of Karmazin (different animal from the spent-up 2011 version Adama beat), or even Albert?

Where the hell are you getting this from?

Adama won't be his third best opponent to date.

 

Lead Right is anti-Geale.

 

IB you cant ever question Lead Right....he is always right.:yep

 

Big disapointment considering at one stage he was talking Golovkin.!!!!

 

Mandatory defence :deal

Either fight Adama and defend the legit title he worked his ass off for years to get.

Or fight a dangerous Glovokin for the WBA secondary regular title in Germany?

:think

 

It's a mandatory.atsch Unless he wants to pay Adama step aside money to fight a ''unification'' bout for the WBA regular belt.

 

Yep probably right move avoiding Golovkin at this stage,a lot seem to be doing it.!!!!

 

Geale ain't avoiding anyone.
He is taking all the right steps and will steamroll whoever they put in front of him in due time, Gonads Golovkin included.

 

:nono

Golovkin would brutalise Geale imo. Then again, discussing Geale with you is a waste of time.

 

What dont you understand about Mandatory defence? He is obliged to fight Adama or be stripped of the title. Why would he do that and then go fight again in Germany for a lesser title for little to no exposure?

No matter what, haters gonna hate :nono

This content is protected

 

You have your opinion, I have mine.
Now **** off if you think I'm a waste of time. atsch

 

This is meant to be a forum for boxing fanatics, but it appears some don't understand what a mandatory defense of a title is and why it's required.

 

School holidays have started Ippy.

 

:good

 

You're probably about right too...