Gene Tunney V Jack Sharkey - September 1927?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Sep 23, 2020.



Who wins it?

  1. Jack Sharkey?

    12.5%
  2. Gene Tunney?

    87.5%
  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    25,049
    28,682
    Jan 8, 2017
    After winning a decision over Jack Dempsey in July of 1927,the Boston Gob now gets a shot at the world heavyweight championship himself.
    Scheduled for 10 rounds, how will Sharkey do against the fighting marine, Gene Tunney?
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tunney 60/40 but the Gob has a shot ,if he is on the top of his game.Big if that!
     
    Fergy, BitPlayerVesti and KasimirKid like this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,946
    32,895
    Feb 11, 2005
    Despite my reservations regarding his heavyweight resume, I have to go with Tunney. He just never learned to lose. There's a mentality there that I don't think Sharkey possessed.
     
  4. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    25,049
    28,682
    Jan 8, 2017
    V true mcvey, who knows really with Sharkey? I wouldn't feel confident ever putting down money on him.
     
    Man_Machine and mcvey like this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,037
    24,041
    Feb 15, 2006
    We would have to favor Tunney as being much more consistent.

    However, if there was anybody left who could beat him, then it was Sharkey!
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and mcvey like this.
  6. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,331
    Feb 10, 2013
    I dont think Sharkey was poised enough. He really had all the tools but he was his own worst enemy. He reminds me of a more successful Golota.
     
  7. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,585
    11,047
    Oct 28, 2017
    I agree with his consistency I'd favor Tunney overall.

    But if we could get the best version of each, I'd pick Sharkey
     
    70sFan865 likes this.