Gene Tunney v Sam Langford

ZODIUS!!! · Dec 27, 2016

blackhercules said: ↑

Tunney's career is based on him beating 160 pound Greb 5 times and beating a overrated washed up Dempsey. Langford's career is based off people who don't know boxing listening to old people talk about how great he was. As I stated his style was primitive beyond belief.

Tunney was a little big more polished than Langford and was naturally the bigger man. He would probably win a boring decision.
Click to expand...

Pure rubbish you don't know boxing

richdanahuff · Dec 27, 2016

dpw417 said: ↑

Sam is rated above Gene as being regarded as the greater fighter due to his career...But given their styles and physical attributes...is Langford the better fighter?

Heavyweights. 15 rounds.
Click to expand...

This content is protected

Combatesdeboxeo_ · Dec 28, 2016

it would be the classic serie of the old times, 3 great fighters fought around 5 times( today if they fight each other once even when one of then is a shot is a miracle). langford would catch him in 1 or 2 fights winning by ko, the rest tunney by decision

Log in or Sign up

Gene Tunney v Sam Langford

ZODIUS!!! The certified boss banned Full Member

richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Gene Tunney v Sam Langford

ZODIUS!!! The certified boss banned Full Member

richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member