gene tunney vs max schmeling

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by bumdujour, Apr 5, 2008.


  1. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    18
    Jul 29, 2007
    say tunney had not retired after the heeney affair and took on max schmeling.

    who wins???
     
  2. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    Tunney UD. Schmeling was a master boxer with a great counter right hand, but Tunney´s chin was good enough to survive those shots, and he was tricky, mobile, etc., 9-5-1
     
  3. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,457
    Jan 6, 2007
    Schmeling's greatest nite was when he beat the young Joe Louis who was flawed.

    Tunney would have been at the top of his game, and very experienced, plus had beaten Dempsey twice.

    Tunney by UD.
     
  4. Bo Bo Olson

    Bo Bo Olson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    5
    Aug 11, 2004
    You got to realise, that Tunney had been thumbed in the eye before the second Dempsey fight and had a blind spot that never left. Which is why after stealing Richarcards money, for the Heeney fight, he retired.
    He said he never saw Dempsy's punch because of the blind spot.

    Schmelling would know about the blind spot, being the first to do slow motion filming of a fight....he had a special process done to do so for the First Louis fight.

    I favor Tunney with out the blind spot by UD.

    Schmelling was 19 before he ever laced on a glove. He'd seen a jack Dempsy fight and decided to go for it. He had a good job being a trained publisher. In Germany all trades are trained.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,845
    29,293
    Jun 2, 2006
    Max was a heavy counterpuncher ,but I wouldnt call him a boxing master Sharkey beat him and was winning their first fight rather handily before fouling out,Tunney had all Sharkey's skills with the addition of a magnificent cool boxing brain ,something that Sharkey definitely didnt have,Tunney by U DEC
     
  6. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    I agree. Sharkey was a head case, and Schmeling had his hands full with him. Gene Tunney, on the other hand, was superior to Sharkey, and had far superior discipline and wasn't hotheaded. Tunney would coolly outbox Max all night, just like he did Dempsey, particularly like he did the first time. As much as I like and respect Schmeling, Gene Tunney was a class above him and would win a lopsided decision, while dishing out heavy punishment with his own right hand.
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    I'd like to say that I'm not selling Max Schmeling short here, as I think he's one of the most screwed over heavyweight champions ever, in my opinion. The Nazi thing, the winning the title on a foul, the blitzing by Louis in their rematch, which again, implied that Nazi label for Max. He was a very good all aound fighter, by that I mean, he had a tactical, smart mind, and used that great right hand of his cleverly, as a fast and accurate counter blow, and of course it had power too. Having said that, I still maintain that Gene Tunney is even MORE screwed over and underrated than even Schmeling. If you read old time accounts of boxing, from the late 20's up to the 50's, and 60's, you get the impression that it was held against him that he beat Jack Dempsey, and the term forever used in describing Tunney has been "colorless", as though personality, and a swashbuckling, exciting, swaggering type of personality is a prerequisite for being judged a great fighter. The scientific, cold and calculating nature of his boxing style has been held against him, much like a guy who, though, not identical to Tunney exactly in style, but cold and calculating nonetheless, Carlos Monzon. The fans and experts who like dramatic, exciting types of fighters, as opposed to those who are just damned effective, seem to impose their bias in judging the greats of the past. In a matchup between Tunney and Schmeling, as I've said, Tunney would be a decisive winner over another very good underrated fighter.
     
  8. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Tunney, by UD. Luigi's analysis is just about spot on.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,845
    29,293
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good Post!
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,674
    27,388
    Feb 15, 2006
    Of course when it actualy took place, Tunney would be geting a bit lazy, and Schmeling would be the unknown up and coming destroyer.
     
  11. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    The Tunney from the Dempsey fights against the Schmeling who beat Louis in their first fight. Would you make either a clear fave? Do you think Schmeling has the power to stop Tunney? etc
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    Schmeling Unanimous Decision- Schmeling was the better boxer and harder puncher, and one dimensional tunney would not be able to control schmeling from the outside.
     
  13. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    I think it would be a close UD, Tunney taking most of the early-mid rounds. I think Schmeling would come on strong late fight but Gene holds out to take the verdict. I've no doubt Schmeling carries more than his fair share of power but I don't think he'd quite be able to close the show here: Tunneys chin is solid and his recuperative powers very good.
     
  14. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Tunney one dimensional? Surely you jest. :huh
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    Gene Tunney retired with 3 young stud hall of fame heavyweights in the division. He'd rather use his last fight up on D level fat tom heeney, rather than a Real A level heavyweight like jack sharkey and george godfrey who were rated higher than tom heeney. The little baby title eliminater tourney in 1928 was one of the most corrupt tourneys ever held and didnt accept black heavyweights in it. Heeney was a joke, tunney knew it and gave him a shot. He wanted no part of Sharkey, Godfrey